<em>This research aims to describe the natural resources management policies in the mineral and coal sectors. The description is based on the social welfare value contained in Law No. 3 of 2020 concerning Amendment of Law No. 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining, as well as Law No. 11 of 2020 concerning Employment and Labour Law. This research employed a normative judicial method based on law regulations that are conceptualized as principles or norms and have evolved into proper human behavior standards. Secondary data were employed by exploring literature correlated with the mineral and coal mining management law and analyzed using juridical-qualitative techniques. Subsequently, the research indicated that the Indonesian government policy in the Mineral and Coal, alongside Omnibus Laws, are unable to accommodate social welfare values and support only profit-oriented businesspersons. This research is expected to proffer suggestions for the central or regional government to make regulations prior to the social welfare principle.</em>

The purpose of this study is to determine the form of additional sanctions that can be applied to corporations in various provisions of the applicable laws and regulations and to analyse the application of various provisions related to additional forms of criminal sanctions as environmental restoration in court decisions. The research method used is normative juridical, namely legal research using library research, by conducting research through library materials or secondary and tertiary data. The form of additional sanctions that can be imposed on companies/corporations in environmental crimes under different statutory provisions. Then the application of additional criminal sanctions oriented towards environmental recovery in court decisions is still rarely implemented properly. Of the two court decisions, only one has complied with applicable regulations and is oriented towards environmental sustainability. The benefits of this research are as a reference source for government agencies to solve problems and environmental management, and can be used as a guide in the search for truth and legal certainty and can be used as a reference in future research.

No abstract

Allah SWT created humans in two types: male and female. But sometimes, in the process of fetal growth in the stomach of pregnant women, things can happen that can interfere with fetal development and cause the fetus to be born in a state that looks like it has multiple sexes, or in medical terms, it is called Ambiguous Genitalia. As health technology advances, a person born with this condition can make repairs or refinements to his genitals after a series of medical examinations are carried out to determine which sex can be perfectly owned according to his biological and psychological conditions. In Indonesia, several similar cases led to changes in gender and names in population data. This can be done after there is a decision from the local District Court that ratifies and justifies the genital surgery that has been carried out. In the absence of a law that regulates the regulation of sex change, the judge is obliged to explore and understand the legal, customary, and religious values of the

scientific development, and on the other hand, can also cause dependence which is very detrimental if misused or used without supervision. Strict and careful. This research includes normative research in law, for normative legal research only recognizes secondary data, including primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Data processing and data analysis depend on the type of data. Research on positive legal inventories, legal principles, clinical legal research, legal systematics, judicial decisions, legal history, and legal comparisons are all included in secondary data. In the Tenggarong District Court Decision Number 390/Pid.Sus/2021/PN. The Public Prosecutor charged the perpetrator, Mattaro bin Juma, with subsidiary charges, where the direct indictment is "Article 114 paragraph (1) jo. Article 132 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009. The subsidiary charges are Article 112 paragraph (1) jo. Article 132 paragraph (1) of the Narcotics Law, as well as more subsidiary charges, namely Article 127 paragraph (1)". People who abuse drugs derive pleasure from them. The drugs themselves need to be owned, kept in their hands, under their control, and available to them. People who abuse drugs are unlikely to use drugs in situations where they have no control over the drugs they use. According to the findings of this investigation, those who abuse drugs must comply with Article 112 of the Narcotics Law. Keywords: Narcotics, Ratio Decidendi, Sentencing.