No abstract

R.M. wrote the article and prepared figures; all authors read and approved the final version of the article. [OPEN] Articles can be viewed without a subscription.

Most molecular-genetic studies of plant defense responses to arthropod herbivores have focused on insects. However, plantfeeding mites are also pests of diverse plants, and mites induce different patterns of damage to plant tissues than do well-studied insects (e.g. lepidopteran larvae or aphids). The two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) is among the most significant mite pests in agriculture, feeding on a staggering number of plant hosts. To understand the interactions between spider mite and a plant at the molecular level, we examined reciprocal genome-wide responses of mites and its host Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Despite differences in feeding guilds, we found that transcriptional responses of Arabidopsis to mite herbivory resembled those observed for lepidopteran herbivores. Mutant analysis of induced plant defense pathways showed functionally that only a subset of induced programs, including jasmonic acid signaling and biosynthesis of indole glucosinolates, are central to Arabidopsis's defense to mite herbivory. On the herbivore side, indole glucosinolates dramatically increased mite mortality and development times. We identified an indole glucosinolate dose-dependent increase in the number of differentially expressed mite genes belonging to pathways associated with detoxification of xenobiotics. This demonstrates that spider mite is sensitive to Arabidopsis defenses that have also been associated with the deterrence of insect herbivores that are very distantly related to chelicerates. Our findings provide molecular insights into the nature of, and response to, herbivory for a representative of a major class of arthropod herbivores.Plants have evolved complex systems of defense to deter and/or prevent feeding by two different groups of organisms: pathogens such as bacteria and fungi, and herbivores such as plant-feeding arthropods. These defense mechanisms include preexisting structural barriers and deterrents as well as induced immune defenses that further protect the plant from biotic stressors. Our understanding of plant defenses derives largely from studies of plant-pathogen interactions, where the availability of genetically tractable interacting organisms has been critical in identifying key elements required for immune responses. The induced defense response to pathogens is a multilayered process that is initiated by the recognition of conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by the pattern recognition receptors. Upon recognition of extracellular PAMPs, pattern recognition receptors induce PAMP-triggered plant immunity that restricts the propagation of pathogens.

The plant canopy functions as an aerial array of light-harvesting antennas. To achieve maximal yield, each leaf within this array and the array as a whole need to rapidly adjust to naturally occurring fluctuations in light intensity and quality. Excessive light stress triggers the closing of pores in leaves called stomata to minimize moisture loss. We found that different leaves within the canopy of an plant, including leaves not directly exposed to light, coordinated stomatal closure in response to light stress by sending and receiving rapid systemic signals. This response required the plant hormones abscisic acid and jasmonic acid and was mediated by a rapid autopropagating wave of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Furthermore, this response depended on the function of genes encoding the ROS-generating NADPH oxidase RBOHD and various stomatal regulators, such as the anion channel SLAC1, GHR1 (guard cell hydrogen peroxide resistant 1), and lipoxygenase 1 (LOX1). Our findings reveal that plants function as highly dynamic and coordinated organisms, optimizing the overall response of their canopies to fluctuating light intensities.

No abstract