Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy in adults worldwide. Over the past few years, major therapeutic advances have improved progression-free and overall survival, as well as quality of life. Despite this recent progress, MM remains incurable in the vast majority of cases. Patients eventually relapse and become refractory to multiple drug classes, making long-term management challenging. In this review, we will focus on the treatment paradigm of relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) in the era of advanced therapies emphasizing the available novel modalities that have recently been incorporated into routine practice, such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, bispecific antibodies, and other promising approaches. We will also discuss major factors that influence the selection of appropriate drug combinations or cellular therapies, such as relapse characteristics, and other disease and patient related parameters. Our goal is to provide insight into the currently available and experimental therapies for RRMM in an effort to guide the therapeutic decision-making process.

No abstract

No abstract

e17108 Background: ICI therapy has become the standard of care for many advanced GU cancers, but immune-related adverse events (IRAE) may result in treatment delays or discontinuation. Concurrent vaccine use has been posited to increase the IRAE risk, but safety data is mixed. There are no published data regarding safety of concurrent inactivated vaccines other than influenza, including and especially in the GU cancer population. Methods: We performed a single-institution, retrospective, matched-cohort (1:2, cohort A:B, vaccinated to control) study of all GU cancer patients treated with an inactivated vaccine 30 days prior to or 60 days following ICI therapy from 2015-2019. Baseline clinical characteristics were abstracted from the electronic health record (EHR). Clinically significant IRAEs were defined as any event developing during or 30 days following ICI therapy requiring therapy with ≥ Prednisone 20 mg daily (or equivalent) or other immunosuppression. Delays were defined as ICI therapy given > 14 days past expected date for cycle 2 or beyond. Bivariate analysis with chi-squared statistics were used to describe incidence. Results: Sixty patients were included: 20 in cohort A (vaccinated) and 40 in cohort B (control). Thirty-seven (61.7%) patients had renal cell carcinoma, 17 (31.7%) had urothelial carcinoma, and 4 (6.7%) had prostate cancer. There was no difference in incidence of clinically significant IRAEs between cohorts A and B (15% vs 32.5%, p = 0.148), nor were differences observed in rates of treatment delays (10% vs 12.5%, p = 0.776) or discontinuation (10% vs 12.5%, p = 0.776) due to IRAEs. Most common vaccines were inactivated influenza (n = 18, 90%) and pneumococcal vaccine (n = 3, 15%). Among the 16 patients experiencing clinically-significant IRAEs, the most common were colitis (n = 3), dermatitis (n = 3), and pneumonitis (n = 3). All patients requiring immunosuppressive therapy received systemic corticosteroids. Conclusions: This retrospective cohort study demonstrates that GU cancer patients receiving inactivated vaccines during ICI therapy does not increase IRAE incidence, treatment delays, or discontinuation, suggesting that inactivated vaccines may be safely administered during ICI therapy in this population. Though influenza vaccines were still the most common, this is the first study to include other inactivated vaccines. Limitations include sample size, EHR accuracy and use of surrogate markers for determination of IRAE incidence. Next steps will include a multi-institutional retrospective study.