While no single model can exactly recapitulate all aspects of multiple sclerosis (MS), animal models are essential in understanding the induction and pathogenesis of the disease and to develop therapeutic strategies that limit disease progression and eventually lead to effective treatments for the human disease. Several different models of MS exist, but by far the best understood and most commonly used is the rodent model of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). This model is typically induced by either active immunization with myelin-derived proteins or peptides in adjuvant or by passive transfer of activated myelin-specific CD4+ T lymphocytes. Mouse models are most frequently used because of the inbred genotype of laboratory mice, their rapid breeding capacity, the ease of genetic manipulation, and availability of transgenic and knockout mice to facilitate mechanistic studies. Although not all therapeutic strategies for MS have been developed in EAE, all of the current US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved immunomodulatory drugs are effective to some degree in treating EAE, a strong indicator that EAE is an extremely useful model to study potential treatments for MS. Several therapies, such as glatiramer acetate (GA: Copaxone), and natalizumab (Tysabri), were tested first in the mouse model of EAE and then went on to clinical trials. Here we discuss the usefulness of the EAE model in understanding basic disease pathophysiology and developing treatments for MS as well as the potential drawbacks of this model.

No abstract

The results of the study indicate that patients diagnosed with Charles Bonnet Syndrome evidence neuropsychological changes commonly associated with the early stages of dementia. Therefore, in patients with impaired vision, the appearance of cognitive deficits, albeit subtle, occur with the onset of visual hallucinations. We propose that isolated visual hallucinations in the older adult may be an indication of the early stages of dementia.

The clinical impact of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) on interferon beta (IFNbeta) efficacy was studied in three large patient cohorts comprising 6698 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients receiving IFNbeta-1b across North America, Europe, and Australia. In North America and Europe, NAb testing was generally undertaken because of a poor clinical response; in Australia, it was mandatory for every patient. Of the 6697 patients tested, 28.9% had at least one NAb titre > or = 20 neutralizing units (NU)/ml, 14.4% had NAb titres > or = 100 NU/ml and 7.7% had NAb titres > or = 400 NU/ml. The NAb-positive rate of 37.0% in Australia was significantly greater than those in North America (21.3%) and Europe (27.6%), and this was observed at every NAb titre level. Our results suggest that NAbs are not responsible for poor clinical responses and that NAb status is of little clinical value. These findings will need to be confirmed in a large independent study.

No abstract