This article questions the status of two recurring concepts in teacher preparation: resistance and ignorance. Both of these terms have significant presence within the teacher education literature. Because both of these terms often occur in relation to a particular topic, that of race and multicultural education, we also utilize race as the discourse that frames our consideration of these two important issues. To reframe and reorient our attention to the processes of ignorance and resistance, we turn to psychoanalytic considerations of those terms and consider what such a turn can offer teacher educators as they engage teacher candidates with issues of race.
In the last decade, the debate over state-mandated standardized testing has become one of the most heated, political debates in education. Situated within that debate and drawing from it, this paper examines the relationship among teachers, teaching, and standardized testing, using the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) as a case study of consequences. Based on a six-month study comprising interviews with five secondary social studies teachers in Michigan, this paper explores how standardized testing and the discourses surrounding it help construct teachers' educational imagination by defining the boundaries of the actual and the possible in social education. With the idea that the meaning of standardized testing and its implications for teachers are not pre-determined but, rather, are constructed through teachers' perceptions-thoughts, feelings, beliefs-of them as they interact with the test and its discourses, the study first identifies and explores the various discourses surrounding the MEAP as well as the MEAP as a discursive practice in and of itself and, second, how teachers' perceptions of the test are constructed through those discourses, how those perceptions guide teachers' responses to the test and its requirements, and what possibilities such responses open and close for them as educators, for the field of social studies education, and for their students as learners and citizens.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.