Coronary artery aneurysm is an uncommon occurrence, yet it is described more often today than in the past as coronary angiography is now routinely used for diagnosis and treatment of ischemic heart disease. However, there is no therapeutic consensus regarding this finding. We present a case of giant coronary artery aneurysm and review the literature on the use of polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents as a therapeutic option for this condition. Combined antiaggregant therapy is needed after the procedure. Randomized controlled trials of surgery versus covered stents are necessary to define the best treatment for large coronary artery aneurysms.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is an emerging complication in HIV-infected patients treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy. Immediate results and long-term outcome after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have not been yet evaluated in this population. Between January 1997 and December 2005, we compared baseline characteristics, immediate results and clinical outcome [Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE): death for cardiac cause, myocardial infarction (MI), coronary revascularization] at 41 months in 27 consecutive HIV-infected (HIV+) patients and 54 HIV-uninfected (HIV-) controls matched for age and gender (mean age of the cohort, 49+/-8 years; 96% male) who underwent CABG. Cardiovascular risk factors were well-balanced and nearly identical in both groups. In HIV+ group, mean preoperative CD4 was 502+/-192/mm(3) compared with 426.2+/-152.6/mm(3) postoperatively (p=0.004) without clinical manifestations at follow-up. At 30-day, the rate of post-operative death, MI, stroke, mediastinitis, re-intervention was identical in both groups. At follow-up [median: 41-months (range: 34-60)], rate of occurrence of 1(st) MACE was higher in HIV+ group compared with HIV- group (11, 42% versus 13, 25%, p=0.03), mostly due to the need of repeated revascularization using percutaneous coronary intervention of the native coronary arteries but not of the grafts in the HIV+ group [9 (35%) versus 6 (11%), p=0.02]. CABG is a feasible and safe revascularization procedure in HIV+ patients with multivessel CAD. Immediate postoperative outcome was similar compared to controls. However, long-term follow-up was significantly different, due to an increased rate of repeated revascularization procedure in the native coronary arteries of HIV+ patients.

Background and Aim Revascularization guidelines support routine Heart Team (HT) discussion of appropriate patients. The effect of HT on decision making and clinical outcomes has not been explored. The aim of our study is to investigate the impact of the HT on the mode and delay to revascularization. Methods We compared data from a prospective cohort of consecutive patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) referred for HT discussion between 2016 and 2017 (HT group) with a historic control group of patients matched according to clinical and angiographic characteristics treated between 2005 and 2015 (No HT group). Results There were 93 patients in each group. The HT group and the No HT groups had a similar rate of ACS as well as cardiovascular risk factors and significant left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. No difference was observed in the mean Society of Thoracic Surgery score (2.5 ± 3 vs 3 ± 3; P = .32) and the mean SYNTAX score was low and similar in both groups (21 ± 6 vs 19 ± 6; P = .59). The treatment recommendations changed greatly, with 63% of patients being referred for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after HT discussion but only 23% in the No HT group (P < .01). HT discussion led to a significant delay to PCI (8 ± 5 vs 1.8 ± 4 days; P = .02), while surgical revascularization times were not affected. Conclusion HT discussion in patients with multivessel CAD was associated with an increased referral to CABG but led to a significant delay in revascularization by angioplasty. The impact of these findings on patient satisfaction and outcome should be further investigated.

Summary Introduction:  Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) activity has increased more than 6 fold in the last 15 years. Increased demand has been met by PCI centres without on‐site surgical facilities. To improve communication between cardiologists and surgeons at a remote centre, we have developed a video conferencing system using standard internet links. The effect of this video data link (VDL) on referral pattern and patient selection for revascularisation was assessed prospectively after introduction of a joint cardiology conference (JCC) using the system. Methods:  Between 1st October 2005 and 31st March 2007, 1346 patients underwent diagnostic coronary angiography (CA). Of these, 114 patients were discussed at a cardiology conference (CC) attended by three consultant cardiologists (pre‐VDL). In April 2007, the VDL system was introduced. Between 1st April 2007 and 30th September 2008, 1428 patients underwent diagnostic CA. Of these, 120 patients were discussed at a JCC attended by four consultant cardiologists and two consultant cardiothoracic surgeons (post‐VDL). Following case‐matching for patient demographics and coronary artery disease (CAD) severity and distribution, we assessed the effect upon management decisions arising from both the pre‐ and post‐VDL JCC meetings. Results:  When comparing decision‐making outcomes of post‐VDL JCC with pre‐VDL CC, significantly fewer patients were recommended for PCI (36.8% vs. 17.2% respectively, p = 0.001) and significantly more patients were recommended for surgery (21.1% vs. 48.4% respectively, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in waiting times for PCI following JCC discussion; however, waiting times for surgical revascularisation were significantly reduced (140.9 ± 71.8 days vs. 99.4 ± 56.6 days respectively, p = 0.045). Conclusions:  The VDL system provides a highly practical method for PCI centres without onsite surgical cover to discuss complex patients requiring coronary revascularisation and significantly increases the number of patients referred for surgical revascularisation rather than PCI.

Background and aim: Revascularization guidelines support routine heart team (HT) discussion of appropriate patients. The effect of HT on decision making and clinical outcomes hasn't been explored. The aim of our study is to investigate the impact of the HT on the mode and delay to revascularization. Methods: We compared data from a prospective cohort of consecutive patients with multivessel coronary artery disease referred for HT discussion between 2016-2017 (HT group) with a historic control group of patients matched according to clinical and angiographic characteristics treated between 2005-2015 (No HT group). Results: There were 93 patients in each group. The HT group and the No HT groups had a similar rate of ACS as well as cardiovascular risk factors and significant left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. No difference was observed in the mean Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) score (2.5± 3 vs. 3 ±3 p=0.32) and the mean SYNTAX score was low and similar in both groups (21±6 vs. 19±6 p=0.59). The treatment recommendations changed greatly, with 63% of patients being referred for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after HT discussion but only 23% in the no HT group (p<0.01). HT discussion led to a significant delay to PCI (8±5 vs. 1.8±4 days, p=0.02), while surgical revascularization times were not affected. Conclusion: HT discussion in patients with multivessel CAD was associated with an increased referral to CABG but led to a significant delay in revascularization by angioplasty. The impact of these findings on patient satisfaction and outcome should be further investigated.