The human brain is an inherently complex and dynamic system. Even at rest, functional brain networks dynamically reconfigure in a well-organized way to warrant an efficient communication between brain regions. However, a precise characterization of this reconfiguration at very fast time-scale (hundreds of millisecond) during rest remains elusive. In this study, we used dense electroencephalography data recorded during task-free paradigm to track the fast temporal dynamics of spontaneous brain networks. Results obtained from network-based analysis methods revealed the existence of a functional dynamic core network formed of a set of key brain regions that ensure segregation and integration functions. Brain regions within this functional core share high betweenness centrality, strength and vulnerability (high impact on the network global efficiency) and low clustering coefficient. These regions are mainly located in the cingulate and the medial frontal cortex. In particular, most of the identified hubs were found to belong to the Default Mode Network. Results also revealed that the same central regions may dynamically alternate and play the role of either provincial (local) or connector (global) hubs.

Epilepsy is a network disease. The epileptic network usually involves spatially distributed brain regions. In this context, noninvasive M/EEG source connectivity is an emerging technique to identify functional brain networks at cortical level from noninvasive recordings. In this paper, we analyze the effect of the two key factors involved in EEG source connectivity processing: (i) the algorithm used in the solution of the EEG inverse problem and (ii) the method used in the estimation of the functional connectivity. We evaluate four inverse solutions algorithms (dSPM, wMNE, sLORETA and cMEM) and four connectivity measures (r , h, PLV, and MI) on data simulated from a combined biophysical/physiological model to generate realistic interictal epileptic spikes reflected in scalp EEG. We use a new network-based similarity index to compare between the network identified by each of the inverse/connectivity combination and the original network generated in the model. The method will be also applied on real data recorded from one epileptic patient who underwent a full presurgical evaluation for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. In simulated data, results revealed that the selection of the inverse/connectivity combination has a significant impact on the identified networks. Results suggested that nonlinear methods (nonlinear correlation coefficient, phase synchronization and mutual information) for measuring the connectivity are more efficient than the linear one (the cross correlation coefficient). The wMNE inverse solution showed higher performance than dSPM, cMEM and sLORETA. In real data, the combination (wMNE/PLV) led to a very good matching between the interictal epileptic network identified from noninvasive EEG recordings and the network obtained from connectivity analysis of intracerebral EEG recordings. These results suggest that source connectivity method, when appropriately configured, is able to extract highly relevant diagnostic information about networks involved in interictal epileptic spikes from non-invasive dense-EEG data.