No abstract

ObjectiveAlthough radiation therapy (RT) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) are the global standards for adjuvant therapy treatment in cervical cancer, many Japanese institutions choose chemotherapy (CT) because of the low frequency of irreversible adverse events. In this study, we aimed to clarify the trends of adjuvant therapy for intermediate/high-risk cervical cancer after radical surgery in Japan.MethodsA questionnaire survey was conducted by the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group to 186 authorized institutions active in the treatment of gynecologic cancer.ResultsResponses were obtained from 129 facilities. Adjuvant RT/CCRT and intensity-modulated RT were performed in 98 (76%) and 23 (18%) institutions, respectively. On the other hand, CT was chosen as an alternative in 93 institutions (72%). The most common regimen of CT, which was used in 66 institutions (51%), was a combination of cisplatin/carboplatin with paclitaxel. CT was considered an appropriate alternative option to RT/CCRT in patients with risk factors such as bulky tumors, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular invasion, parametrial invasion, and stromal invasion. The risk of severe adverse events was considered to be lower for CT than for RT/CCRT in 109 institutions (84%).ConclusionThis survey revealed a variety of policies regarding adjuvant therapy among institutions. A clinical study to assess the efficacy or non-inferiority of adjuvant CT is warranted.

Atypical protein kinase C λ/ι (aPKCλ/ι) is a regulator of epithelial cellular polarity. It is also overexpressed in several cancers and functions in cell proliferation and invasion. Therefore, we hypothesized that aPKCλ/ι may be involved in development and progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), the precancerous disease of cervical cancer induced by human papillomavirus. To do this, we investigated the relationship between aPKCλ/ι expression and CIN. aPKCλ/ι expression level and subcellular localization were assessed in 192 CIN biopsy samples and 13 normal epithelial samples using immunohistochemistry. aPKCλ/ι overexpression (normal epithelium, 7.7%; CIN1, 41.7%; CIN2/3, 76.4%) and aPKCλ/ι nuclear localization (normal epithelium, 0.0%; CIN1, 36.9%; CIN2/3, 78.7%) were higher in CIN samples than normal samples (P<0.05), suggesting that CIN grade is related to aPKCλ/ι overexpression and nuclear localization. Then, 140 CIN cases were retrospectively analyzed for 4-yr cumulative disease progression and regression rates using the Cox proportional hazards model. CIN1 cases with aPKCλ/ι overexpression or aPKCλ/ι nuclear localization had a higher progression rate than CIN1 cases with normal aPKCλ/ι expression levels or cytoplasmic localization (62.5% vs. 9.7% and 63.1% vs. 9.4%, respectively; P<0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that human papillomavirus types 16 and 18, aPKCλ/ι overexpression (hazard ratio=4.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-12.1; P=0.007), and aPKCλ/ι nuclear localization (hazard ratio=3.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-10.4; P=0.019) were independent risk factors for CIN1 progression. In conclusion, aPKCλ/ι could be useful for the therapeutic management of patients with CIN, particularly those with non-human papillomavirus 16/18 types.