Breast tuberculosis (TB) is a rare localization of extra-pulmonary TB. We report the first case observed in our daily activities to show the difficulties in the diagnosis and the good evolution in the treatment. In spite of the fact that it is rare, breast TB should not be ignored, especially in a country with high TB endemicity.
Background: The iterative caesarean section, is a caesarean section that is performed on a uterus already healed, therefore for fear of maternal and perinatal risks, is recognized as one of the main causes of the inflation of caesarean section in the world. One in three caesarean sections is performed because of a scar uterus. Objective of this study was to analyse the epidemiological and clinical factors of iterative caesarean sections in the gynecology-obstetrics department at the Teaching Hospital of Cocody (Abidjan).Methods: This was a retrospective and descriptive study conducted from June 1st, 2018 to May 31st, 2019, including 349 iterative caesarean section cases.Results: The first iterative C-section accounted for 16.1% of the C-section indications during the study period. The average age of the patients was 30 years. Nearly half of the patients practiced in the informal sector 47.9%, were uneducated in 38.1% of cases and lived with a partner in 73.1% of cases. The majority of patients in this series 75.1% performed at least 4 ANCs. Patients were followed by prenatal visits in 61% of cases by midwives and in 8.6% of cases had an inter-reproductive space of less than 18 months. This study patients were evacuated in 46.4% of cases. Acute fetal distress was the first indication of first iterative caesarean section with 20.3% of cases. Emergency caesarean sections accounted for 84.4% of the cases in this series. Authors found maternal death 0.3% and 6.7% perinatal mortality.Conclusions: The iterative caesarean section is a caesarean section likely to cause difficulties and complications per- operative. Although in constant improvement the prognosis of the mother-child couple still remains a problem in this context, prenatal monitoring should be the prerogative of obstetrician gynecologists.
Background: Vaginitis is a frequent and treated based on clinical evaluation in our countries in absence of microbiological laboratories. Evaluate the effectiveness of the management of vaginitis by ternidazole, neomycin sulfate, nystatin, prednisolone association.Methods: A five-month prospective study was carried out in three health facilities in Abidjan. Two-hundred and thirty-three patients with clinical signs of vaginitis were included after signed consent. Pregnant and breast-feeding patients, hypersensitivity or idiosyncrasy to ternidazole, neomycin sulfate, nystatin, prednisolone association were not included. Patients were divided into reference group (n=200) for which a microbiological analysis of vaginal secretions was carried out 2-4 days before treatment and control group (n=33) for which treatment was initiated straightaway. Evaluation criteria were clinical symptoms, microbiological balance carried out 10 to 14 days after treatment and occurrence of side effects. Statistical tests used were Khi2 and exact Fisher test (p<0.05).Results: Pathological leucorrhoea was differently observed in both group (p=0.001). During the follow-up visit, the persistence of symptoms was not different (p=0.99). This combination has demonstrated its efficacy in cases of Candida albicans vaginitis, bacterial vaginosis, trichomonas vaginalis vaginitis, and mixed vaginitis. A significantly improvement of symptoms (p=0.001) and low rate of biologically proven recurrence was observed in both groups. No allergic reactions linked was reported.Conclusions: In our countries this therapeutic combination appears to be an option for treated mixed vaginitis in first intention without preliminary samples of vaginal secretions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.