Background: Metaplastic breast cancer (MetBC) represents a therapeutic challenge. We evaluated the impact of clinicopathological characteristics and treatment modalities on outcomes among MetBC patients treated at our center. Methods: Women with stage I-III MetBC were reviewed from our database from 2005-2018. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate locoregional-failure-free survival (LRFFS), overall-survival (OS) and distant-metastases-free survival (DMFS). We assessed associations with survival outcomes by log-rank tests. Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models were used to identify independent predictors of LRFFS, OS and DMFS. Results: 81 patients were eligible for the study. Median age at diagnosis was 48 years. 90.1% had G-III tumors, 64.2% were pathologically node negative and lympho-vascular invasion (LVI) was absent in 72.8%. 67.8% were triple negative, and 7.4% were HER2-neu positive. Most (66.7%) patients underwent mastectomy. Free margins were achieved in the entire cohort, however, 17.3% had close margin (<2 mm). Almost all patients received chemotherapy. 75.3% received radiotherapy, 23.5% received hormonal therapy and 6.2% received Trastuzumab. With a median follow-up of 54 months, 18.5% developed loco-regional recurrence and 34.6% relapsed distally. Five-year OS was 66.0%. On multivariate analysis: adjuvant radiotherapy correlated with better OS ( P < .0001), and tumor size >5 cm, nodal involvement and LVI correlated with worse OS, ( P = .019, P = .021, P = .028, respectively). There were no survival differences with respect to age, triple negativity, and morphologic subtype. Conclusion: We report the largest single institutional series on MetBC in the Middle East region. MetBC confers worse survival outcomes, and more aggressive local and systemic treatment strategies should be investigated.
Purpose
Though less than 5% of patients with breast cancer present with De Novo Metastasis (dnMBC) in Western societies, this percentage may reach 30% in developing countries. In this study, we present survival outcomes of patients diagnosed with dnMBC treated at a tertiary center in a developing country.
Patients and Methods
Using hospital-based database, consecutive patients with dnMBC diagnosed between 2013 and 2017 were identified. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, types of treatment, and survival data were retrospectively collected.
Results
A total of 435 patients were included; median age (range) at time of diagnosis was 51 (24–85) years. Most of the tumors expressed hormone receptors (81% Estrogen Receptor positive, 77% Progesterone Receptor positive). Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) overexpression was reported in 134 (30.9%) patients, while only 24 (5.5%) had Triple Negative (TN) disease. Bone, lung and liver were the most common sites of metastasis involved in 70.6%, 36.1%, and 32.0%, respectively. The median Overall Survival (OS) for all patients was 38 months, and 5-year OS was 32.6%. On univariate analysis, high tumor grade, advanced T-stage, TN-disease and metastasis to multiple sites, but not HER2 status, were associated with poor OS. On multivariate analysis, high tumor grade (Hazard Ratio =1.6, p=0.002), advanced T-stage (Hazard Ratio=1.6, p=0.003), and triple negative status (Hazard Ratio= 2.1, p=0.008) predicted poor OS.
Conclusion
The overall survival of patients with dnMBC remains poor. Better understanding of the disease behavior and factors affecting survival is required for optimal utilization of available regimens and new drugs to hopefully improve patients’ outcomes.
Background: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is the current standard treatment for early stage breast cancer (EBC) patients. Although, long-term randomized trials have demonstrated its safety in terms of overall survival, those studies did not consider breast cancer as a heterogenous disease. Recent evidence has demonstrated distinct local recurrence (LR) rates across breast cancer subtypes.Legal entity responsible for the study: Karolinska Institutet.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.