No abstract

Readily available interferometric data (InSAR) of the coseismic deformation field caused by recent seismic\ud events clearly show that major earthquakes produce crustal deformation over wide areas, possibly resulting\ud in significant stress loading/unloading of the crust. Such stress must be considered in the evaluation\ud of seismic hazards of nuclear power plants (NPP) and, in particular, for the potential of surface slip (i.e.,\ud probabilistic fault displacement hazard analysis - PFDHA) on both primary and distributed faults.\ud In this study, based on the assumption that slip on pre-existing structures can represent the elastic\ud response of compliant fault zones to the permanent co-seismic stress changes induced by other major\ud seismogenic structures, we propose a three-step procedure to address fault displacement issues and consider\ud possible influence of surface faulting/deformation on vibratory ground motion (VGM). This\ud approach includes: (a) data on the presence and characteristics of capable faults, (b) data on recognized\ud and/or modeled co-seismic deformation fields and, where possible, (c) static stress transfer between\ud source and receiving faults of unknown capability.\ud The initial step involves the recognition of the major seismogenic structures nearest to the site and\ud their characterization in terms of maximum expected earthquake and the time frame to be considered\ud for determining their ‘‘capability” (as defined in the International Atomic Energy Agency - IAEA\ud Specific Safety Guide SSG-9). Then a GIS-based buffer approach is applied to identify all the faults near\ud the NPP, possibly influenced by the crustal deformation induced by the major seismogenic structures.\ud Faults inside these areas have to be tested for ‘‘capability” according to the same time window defined\ud for the primary seismogenic structures.\ud If fault capability is confirmed or, eventually, cannot be assessed, the next step is to implement an\ud approach based on the potential to affect the safety of the NPP site in terms of fault geometry, and potential\ud displacement.\ud Finally, in the case where the fault can affect the safety of the site, the third step is the PFDHA or, in\ud other words, the calculation of the annual probability of exceedance of the potential co-seismic fault displacement;\ud this displacement is to be compared with the fault displacement threshold that will impact\ud the safety of the NPP site.\ud We also consider the effect of site vicinity tectonism on site vibratory ground motion and discuss an\ud example in the light of the use of the GMPE

No abstract

the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

No abstract