UKA is a viable option for treating unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. With the proper indications and an accurate technique UKA may be indicated also in very elderly patients with reduced complications and morbidity, and excellent survivorship.

No abstract

The purpose of this study was to report early complications for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) performed for instability arthropathy after a prior coracoid transfer procedure and compare them with those of a control group of patients following aTSA for primary osteoarthritis. A retrospective review was performed of 14 patients after aTSA with a prior coracoid transfer procedure. A control group of 42 patients with an aTSA for primary osteoarthritis were matched 3:1 according to age, sex, body mass index, comorbidities, and dominant shoulder. Chart reviews identified any complications within 1 year, in addition to blood loss and operative time in both groups. Preoperative computed tomography scans were used to determine Walch glenoid classification and Goutallier classification of the subscapularis. The mean operative time was not significantly different between the coracoid transfer cohort and the control group, and the mean estimated blood loss was only 6.9 mL greater in the coracoid transfer group. The coracoid transfer group had 2 (14.3%) patients with complications, with 1 early revision for an acute deep infection. The control group had 4 (9.5%) complications in 3 (7.1%) patients, with no early revisions. There was no statistical difference in complications between the groups ( P =.618). Anatomic TSA for instability arthropathy after coracoid transfer had similar operative time, blood loss, and 1-year complication rates as those of the control group. These results provide some evidence to support the continued use of aTSA in select patients with instability arthropathy after prior coracoid transfer procedure. [ Orthopedics . 2021;44(4):e482–e486.]

ObjectivesBursitis of the olecranon and the patella are not rare disorders, and conservative management is successful in most cases. However, when patients do not respond to conservative treatment, open excisional surgery or, recently, endoscopic bursectomy, can be used. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of open and endoscopic treatments of olecranon and prepatellar bursitis.Patients and methodsForty-nine patients (37 male and 12 female), who were treated with endoscopic bursectomy (25 patients) or open bursectomy (24 patients) were included in this study. Thirty patients had olecranon bursitis, while 19 patients had prepatellar bursitis. The patients’ average age was 61.1 ± 12.3 (range 33-81) years. All of the patients’ hospitalization and surgery times were recorded.The satisfaction of the patients was evaluated with a satisfaction scoring system, as well as by evaluating residual pain, the range of joint movement, and the cosmetic results of the procedure.ResultsThe average follow-up time was 16 ± 9 months (range 12–27). The median operation time was 23.2 ± 3.5 minutes for the endoscopic bursectomy group and 26.4 ± 6.8 minutes for the open bursectomy group. The median hospitalization time was 0.56 ± 0.5 days (range 0-1 day) for the endoscopic group and 1 ± 0 days for the open bursectomy group (P<0.01).According to the patient satisfaction questionnaire, the endoscopic bursectomy group’s score was 8.5 ± 1.3 (range 5-10), and the open bursectomy group’s score was 5.29 ± 1.8 (range 1-9) (P<0.01).ConclusionEndoscopic bursectomy is a time-saving and efficient surgical treatment option for patients with prepatellar and olecranon bursitis.

No abstract