The majority of the tasks were completed in a shorter time using 3D LVS compared to 2D LVS. The subjective Likert-scale ratings from each group also demonstrated a clear preference for 3D LVS. New 3D LVS has the potential to improve the learning curve, and reduce the operating time and error rate during the performances of laparoscopic surgeons. Our results suggest that the new-generation 3D HD LVS will be helpful for surgeons in laparoscopy (Clinical Trial ID: NCT01799577, Protocol ID: BEHGynobs-4).

The aim of this case report is to demonstrate the robot-assisted laparoscopic decompression approach to treat the aberrant vessels entrapping the sacral nerves causing pelvic pain. A 34-year-old female patient had been complaining about pelvic pain on the left perineal region which was radiating to the sacral 1-2 nerves dermatome for 3 years. Decompression of sacral nerve roots and sciatic nerve was performed via robotassisted and a four-arm Da Vinci Si Surgical System laparoscopic approach. This case report is the first presentation of robot-assisted laparoscopic management of a vascular entrapment of the sacral nerve roots. The robotic technique offers, three-dimensional vision, improved maneuverability and enhanced ergonomics in the deepest area in the pelvis and could be a valid alternative to laparoscopy in the treatment of intrapelvic neurovascular entrapments.

Background/Aims: The objective of this study was to compare the depth and width of thermal spread caused on rat uterine tissue after application of 3 different electrosurgical generators. Methods: Alsa Excell 350 MCDSe (Unit A), Meditom DT-400P (Unit M), and ERBE Erbotom VIO 300 D (Unit E) electrosurgical units (ESUs) were used. The number of Wistar Hannover rats required to obtain valid results was 10. The primary objective of the study was to compare the 3 ESUs using the same instrument and the same waveform. The secondary objective of the study was to compare the differences between monopolar and bipolar systems of each ESU separately using the same waveform. Results: The thermal spread caused by each ESU using monopolar instruments with continuous and interrupted waveforms was significantly different. Among the 3 devices, Unit A caused the largest thermal uterine tissue spread. On the other hand, Unit E caused the most superficial thermal tissue spread, and the smallest thermal spread among all ESUs. Conclusions: Surgeons should note that different ESUs used with the same power output might create different thermal effects especially in the monopolar configuration within the same waveform, for the same duration, and with the same instrument.

No abstract