Introduction: The syndrome of post-bariatric surgery axonal polyneuropathy (PAP) may present with various sensory and motor symptoms including paralysis. We aim to describe the diagnostic features and outcome of treatment of the acute paralytic form of PAP (acute paralytic PAP [APPAP]) as it was not described in a separate cohort previously. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical charts and described the clinical, electrodiagnostic features, treatment, and outcome for patients who presented to our clinical neurophysiology unit with disabling weakness within 24 months post-bariatric surgery. The main outcome measure was the percent of patients who are able to walk independently at the last visit and comparing the group who resumed walking independently at 6 months to the group who did not, in regards to the use of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg). Results: Thirteen patients were included (10 women and 3 men) with a mean age of 29.8 years (SD 12.5). All presented with loss of ambulation resembling Guillain-Barre Syndrome. The median time of onset was 4 months (interquartile range [IQR] 3–6) post-surgery, and the median time to weakness nadir was 3 weeks (IQR 3–3.5) with an average weight loss of 38.6 kg (SD 17.09). All patients regained their ability to ambulate; however, the ability to walk independently was achieved in 66.7% of patients. The percent of patients who were able to ambulate independently at 6 months were 16% with IVIg versus 66.7% without IVIg. Conclusion: The syndrome of ­APPAP develops in the first-year post-bariatric surgery. The majority of patients regain independent ambulation.

Background Guillain–Barre syndrome (GBS) is an inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy characterized by rapidly evolving weakness and areflexia, reaching nadir within 4 weeks. Data on the characteristic of GBS in Saudi Arabia are limited. This study aimed to describe the clinical, electrophysiological, and laboratory characteristics and outcome of a multicenter cohort of patients with GBS. Methods This is a retrospective multicenter nationwide study. Patients who had GBS, identified through Brighton Criteria, between January 2015 and December 2019 were included. Data collected included demographics, clinical features, cerebrospinal fluid profile, reported electrophysiological patterns, treatment, and outcome. Reported GBS subtypes were compared using chi-square, Fisher's exact, or Mann–Whitney U tests, as appropriate. Results A total of 156 patients with GBS were included (men, 61.5%), with a median age of 38 (interquartile range, 26.25–53.5) years. The most commonly reported antecedent illnesses were upper respiratory tract infection (39.1%) and diarrhea (27.8%). All but two patients (98.7%) had weakness, 64.1% had sensory symptoms, 43.1% had facial diplegia, 33.8% had oropharyngeal weakness, 12.4% had ophthalmoplegia, and 26.3% needed mechanical ventilation. Cytoalbuminological dissociation was observed in 69.1% of the patients. GBS-specific therapy was administered in 96.8% of the patients, of whom 88.1% had intravenous immunoglobulin, and 11.9% had plasmapheresis. Approximately half of the patients were able to walk independently within 9 months after discharge, and a third regained the ability to walk independently thereafter. Death of one patient was caused by septicemia. Acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy was the most commonly reported GBS subtype (37.7%), followed by acute motor axonal neuropathy (29.5%), and acute motor-sensory axonal neuropathy (19.2%). Conclusion The clinical and laboratory characteristics and outcome of GBS in the Arab population of Saudi Arabia are similar to the international cohorts. The overall prognosis is favorable.

Aim:We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the efficacy and safety of mirogabalin in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP). Methods:We searched four databases from inception to 1st July 2020. We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which assessed the effectiveness and safety of mirogabalin in patients with DPNP. We evaluated the quality of the included RCTs using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. We pooled dichotomous outcomes as risk ratios and continuous outcomes as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals, both under the random-or fixed-effects model.Results: Three RCTs matched our inclusion criteria with a total of 1732 patients with DPNP: 1057, 534 and 141 patients received mirogabalin, placebo and pregabalin, respectively. The quality of included RCTs was marked as moderate-to-high.Mirogabalin treatment was significantly associated with a significant reduction in the average daily pain score (ADPS) compared with placebo over 7 weeks. Compared with pregabalin, mirogabalin was significantly associated with more decrease in ADPS only after 3, 4 and 5 weeks. The proportion of patients with ≥30% and ≥50% reduction in the ADPS was significantly higher in the mirogabalin vs placebo and pregabalin groups. Compared with placebo, mirogabalin was significantly associated with more adverse events of dizziness, increased weight, peripheral oedema and somnolence.The safety profile was comparable between mirogabalin and pregabalin. Conclusions:Our systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that in patients with DPNP, mirogabalin treatment was superior to placebo and pregabalin in decreasing the ADPS over time. Besides, mirogabalin was largely safe and associated with some adverse events that could be managed conservatively. | INTRODUC TI ONDiabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) is a frequent aftermath of diabetes mellitus. It is estimated to affect nearly one-third of patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. 1,2 Patients with DPNP experience various morbidities, including decreased work productivity, sleep disturbance, anxiety and depression. Eventually, these morbidities unfavourably influence the quality of well-being How to cite this article: Alyoubi RA, Alshareef AA, Aldughaither SM, et al. Efficacy and safety of mirogabalin treatment in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Background: The arterial blood gas (ABG) parameters of patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) with acute neuromuscular respiratory failure (NMRF) and non-NMRF have not been defined or compared in the literature. Methods: We retrospectively collected the initial ABG parameters (pH, PaCO2, PaO2, and HCO3) of patients admitted to ICUs with acute respiratory failure. We compared ABG parameter ranges and the prevalence of abnormalities in NMRF versus non-NMRF and its categories, including primary pulmonary disease (PPD) (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and bronchiectasis), pneumonia, and pulmonary edema. Results: We included 287 patients (NMRF, n = 69; non-NMRF, n = 218). The difference between NMRF and non-NMRF included the median (interquartile range (IQR)) of pH (7.39 (7.32–7.43), 7.33 (7.22–7.39), p < 0.001), PaO2 (86.9 (71.4–123), 79.6 (64.6–99.1) mmHg, p = 0.02), and HCO3 (24.85 (22.9–27.8), 23.4 (19.4–26.8) mmol/L, p = 0.006). We found differences in the median of PaCO2 in NMRF (41.5 mmHg) versus PPD (63.3 mmHg), PaO2 in NMRF (86.9 mmHg) versus pneumonia (74.3 mmHg), and HCO3 in NMRF (24.8 mmol/L) versus pulmonary edema (20.9 mmol/L) (all p < 0.01). NMRF compared to non-NMRF patients had a lower frequency of hypercarbia (24.6% versus 39.9%) and hypoxia (33.8% versus 50.5%) (all p < 0.05). NMRF compared to PPD patients had lower frequency of combined hypoxia and hypercarbia (13.2% versus 37.8%) but more frequently isolated high bicarbonate (33.8% versus 8.9%) (all p < 0.001). Conclusions: The ranges of ABG changes in NMRF patients differed from those of non-NMRF patients, with a greater reduction in PaO2 in non-NMRF than in NMRF patients. Combined hypoxemia and hypercarbia were most frequent in PPD patients, whereas isolated high bicarbonate was most frequent in NMRF patients.

No abstract