A central issue in the analysis of complex networks is the assessment of their robustness and vulnerability. A variety of measures have been proposed in the literature to quantify the robustness of networks and a number of graph-theoretic parameters have been used to derive formulas for calculating network reliability. In this paper, we study the vulnerability of interconnection networks to the failure of individual nodes, using a graph-theoretic concept of residual closeness as a measure of network robustness which provides a much fuller characterization of the network.
For a vertex v of a graph G = (V,E), the independent domination number (also called the lower independence number) iv(G) of G relative to v is the minimum cardinality of a maximal independent set in G that contains v. The average lower independence number of G is [Formula: see text]. In this paper, this parameter is defined and examined, also the average lower independence number of gear graphs is considered. Then, an algorithm for the average lower independence number of any graph is offered.
An exponential dominating set of graph [Formula: see text] is a kind of distance domination subset [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the length of a shortest path in [Formula: see text] if such a path exists, and [Formula: see text] otherwise. The minimum exponential domination number, [Formula: see text] is the smallest cardinality of an exponential dominating set. The minimum exponential domination number, [Formula: see text] can be decreased or increased by removal of some vertices from [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we investigate of this phenomenon which is referred to critical and stability in graphs.
Networks are known to be prone to node or link failures. A central issue in the analysis of networks is the assessment of their stability and reliability. The main aim is to understand, predict, and possibly even control the behavior of a networked system under attacks or disfunctions of any type. A central concept that is used to assess stability and robustness of the performance of a network under failures is that of vulnerability. A network is usually represented by an undirected simple graph where vertices represent processors and edges represent links between processors. Different approaches to properly define a measure for graph vulnerability has been proposed so far. In this paper, we study the vulnerability of cycles and related graphs to the failure of individual vertices, using a measure called residual closeness which provides a more sensitive characterization of the graph than some other well-known vulnerability measures.
The vulnerability of a network measures the resistance of the network to disruption of operation after the failure of certain stations or communication links. If we think of a graph as modeling a network, several vulnerability measures have been used to describe the stability of networks, including connectivity, toughness, scattering number, binding number and integrity. We consider a new characteristic, residual closeness which is more sensitive than the well-known vulnerability measures. Residual closeness measures the network resistance evaluating closeness after removal of vertices or links. In this paper, closeness, vertex residual closeness (VRC) and normalized vertex residual closeness (NVRC) of wheels and some related networks namely gear and friendship graph are calculated, and exact values are obtained.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.