This study aimed at prospectively compared efficacy of non-contrast-enhanced (non-CE) MRI and MDCT for management of pulmonary nodules. A total of 161 patients with 200 nodules underwent MDCT and non-CE MRI (T1WI, T2WI, and STIR) in conjunction with pathological and/or more than 2 years of follow-up examinations. To compare qualitative detection rates between both modalities, all nodules were visually assessed. To compare quantitative and qualitative diagnostic capabilities of MRI, calculation of contrast ratio and visual assessment of probability for malignancy in each nodule were performed. Then, detection rate and diagnostic capability were statistically compared. Although the overall detection rate of each MR sequence (82.5%) was significantly lower than that of MDCT (97.0%, p<0.05), that of malignant nodules showed no significant difference (p>0.05). The diagnostic capability of STIR was significantly higher than those of other MR sequences (p<0.05). Non-CE MR imaging was found to be as useful as MDCT for management of pulmonary nodules.

These results suggest that the frequency of going outdoors may be a useful and simple indicator to predict changes in functional capacity, intellectual activity and self-efficacy.

The results suggest that a preventive home visit program might be ineffective on functional and psychosocial status among ambulatory frail elders overall, although it might significantly improve ADLs, IADLs and depression for those with ADL dependency.

SEM measures are associated with concurrent erythema and PUs and future (1 week later) development of erythema/Stage 1 PUs. SEM may assist in predicting early PU damage, allowing for earlier intervention to prevent skin damage.