Background According to the recent global cancer statistics, breast cancer is the leading cause of deaths among women with 2.3 million new cases globally. Likewise, cervical cancer is also among the leading causes of mortality among women. Polygonum hydropiper is traditionally known for its cytotoxic effects and several bioactive cytotoxic compounds were isolated from it. This study was aimed to isolate potential anticancer compounds from its most potent fractions and evaluate their anticancer potentials. Methods Based on our earlier studies, active fractions including chloroform and ethyl acetate were subjected to column chromatography for isolation of compounds. Chemical structures of isolated compounds were confirmed via 1H NMR, 13C NMR, mass spectrometry. Purified compounds were tested for cytotoxicity against breast cancer cells (MCF-7), cervical cancer cells (HeLA) and NIH/3T3 fibroblasts cells cultures using MTT assy. Anti-angiogenic potentials of isolated compounds were evaluated via chorioallantoic membrane assay. Anti-tumor studies were done using Agrobacterium tumefaciens induced potato tumor assay. Furthermore, to understand the binding modes of Isolated compounds, molecular docking was performed against EGFR, HER2 and VEGFR using MOE as docking software. Results Two bioactive compounds PH-1 (4-methyl-5-oxo-tetrahydrofuran-3-yl acetate) and PH-2 (methyl 4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzoate) were purified from the active fractions. In cytotoxicity studies, PH-1 exhibited highest cytotoxicity against HeLA cells with 87.50% lethality at 1 mgmL−1 concentration and LD50 of 60 µgmL−1. Likewise, PH-2 showed 82.33% cytotoxicity against HeLA cells with LD50 of 160 µgmL−1. Similarly, PH-1 and PH-2 exhibited LD50 of 170 and 380 µgmL−1 respectively. Moreover, PH-1 and PH-2 were also very potent cytotoxic compounds against NIH/3T3 cells with 81.45 and 85.55% cytotoxicity at 1 mgL−1 concentration and LD50 of 140 and 58 µgL−1 respectively. Isolated compounds exhibited considerable anti-angiogenic potentials with IC50 of 340 and 500 µgL−1 respectively for PH-1 and PH-2. In anti-tumor assay, PH-1 and PH-2 exhibited 81.15 and 76.09% inhibitions with LD50 of 340 and 550 µgL−1 respectively. Both compounds selectively binds with EGFR and HER2 receptors with low binding energies. Both compounds exhibited stronger interactions with VEGFR through binding pocket residues Lys868, Val916 and Asp1046. Conclusions Both compounds cause considerable cytotoxicity against cancer cells. The anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor results suggests additional tumor suppressive properties. Docking analysis suggests that these compound not only has the ability to bind to EGFR and HER2 but also equally binds to VEGFR and may act as potential anti-angiogenic agents.
Pyrazinoic acid-resistant tuberculosis is a severe chronic disorder. First-line drugs specifically target the ribosomal protein subunit-1 (RpsA) and stop trans-translation in the wild-type bacterium, causing bacterial cell death. In mutant bacterial strain, the deletion of ala438 does not let the pyrazinoic acid to bind to the active site of RpsA and ensures that the bacterium survives. Hence, such tuberculosis cases require an immediate and successful regime. The current study was designed to identify inhibitors that could bind to the mutant state of the RpsA protein. Initially, a pharmacophore model was generated based on the recently published most potent inhibitor for the mutant state of RpsA, i.e., zrl 15. The validated pharmacophore model was further used for virtual screening of two chemical libraries, i.e., ZINC and ChemBridge. After applying the Lipinski rule of five (Ro5), a total of 260 and 749 hits from the ChemBridge and ZINC libraries, respectively, were identified using pharmacophore mapping. These hits were then docked into the active site of the mutant state of the RpsA protein, and later, the top 150 compounds from each library were chosen based on the docking score. A total of 21 compounds were shortlisted from each library based on the best protein–ligand interactions. Finally, a total of 05 compounds were subjected to molecular dynamics study to examine the dynamic behavior of each compound in the active site of the mutant state of the RpsA protein. The results revealed that all compounds had good chemical properties such as absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET), and there was no Pan Assay Interference (PAINS) or deviation from Ro5, indicating that these compounds could be useful antagonists for the mutant state of the RpsA protein.
The current research reports the synthesis of 14 para-substituted thiosemicarbazone derivatives in good to excellent yields using standard procedures. Initially, 4-ethoxybenzaldehyde (1) and 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (2) were refluxed with thiosemicarbazide in the presence of acetic acid in ethanol for 4–5 h. Then, various substituted phenacyl bromides were treated with the desired thiosemicarbazones (3 and 4) in the presence of triethylamine in ethanol with constant stirring for 5–6 h. The resulting derivatives were confirmed through electron impact mass spectrometry and 1H NMR spectroscopy and evaluated for anticholinesterase inhibitory activity. Among the series, four compounds, 19, 17, 7, and 6, showed potent inhibitory activity against the acetylcholinesterase (AChE) enzyme, having IC50 values of 110.19 ± 2.32, 114.57 ± 0.15, 140.52 ± 0.11, and 160.04 ± 0.02 μM, respectively, compared with standard galantamine (IC50 = 104.5 ± 1.20 μM). Similarly, compounds 19 (IC50 = 145.11 ± 1.03 μM), 9 (IC50 = 147.20 ± 0.09 μM), 17 (IC50 = 150.36 ± 0.18 μM), and 6 (IC50 = 190.21 ± 0.13 μM) were the most excellent inhibitors of butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) when compared with the standard drug galantamine (IC50 = 156.8 ± 1.50 μM). In silico studies were accomplished on the produced derivatives in order to explain the binding interface of compounds with the active sites of AChE and BChE enzymes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.