Objectives: This study aimed to compare maternal and neonatal side effects of natural vaginal delivery (NVD) under neuro-axial analgesia with usual NVD and C-section. Methods: In this single center prospective cohort study, deliveries carried out in a 7 months' period were evaluated after getting informed consent. The study is approved by the ethics committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. Mothers were categorized into 3 groups of C-section, NVD with an analgesia, intervention, and usual NVD. Afterwards, maternal and neonatal side effects after delivery were assessed using physical examinations, laboratory results, and interviews. Results: Overall, 121 mothers were equally assigned to 3 groups. No significant differences were found in the first and fifth-minute APGAR scores of the neonates born in these 3 groups. Moreover, none of the neonates' fifth-minute APGAR scores were less than 7. In addition, hypoxia (umbilical artery pH < 7.2) was observed more in the neonates delivered by NVDs with analgesia interventions compared to the other 2 groups. In comparison with the mothers in the other 2 groups, headache and pruritus were more prevalent among the mothers who had NVDs under neuro-axial analgesia. Conclusions: Given the advantages of natural vaginal deliveries for mothers and their fetuses and considering the side effects of C-sections without medical indications, propagating painless NVDs could be a proper solution for increasing the prevalence rate of NVDs in the society. Conducting further studies on larger samples is recommended.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.