No abstract

No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Purpose:To determine changes in refractive state and corneal parameters after cycloplegia with cyclopentolate hydrochloride 1% using a dual Scheimpflug imaging system.Methods:In this prospective cross-sectional study patients aged 10 to 40 years who were referred for optometric evaluation enrolled and underwent autorefraction and corneal imaging with the Galilei dual Scheimpflug system before and 30 minutes after twice instillation of medication. Changes in refraction and astigmatism were investigated. Corneal biometrics including anterior and posterior corneal curvatures, total corneal power and corneal pachymetry were compared before and after cycloplegia.Results:Two hundred and twelve eyes of 106 subjects with mean age of 28 ± 5 years including 201 myopic and 11 hyperopic eyes were evaluated. Mean spherical equivalent refractive error before cycloplegia was -3.4 ± 2.6 D. A mean hyperopic shift of 0.4 ± 0.5 D occurred after cycloplegia (P < 0.001). The astigmatism power did not significantly change (P = 0.8), however, 26.8% of eyes with significant astigmatism experienced a change of more than 5 degrees in the axis of astigmatism. Changes in posterior corneal curvature were scant but statistically significant (P = 0.001). Moreover, corneal thickness was slightly increased in the central and paracentral regions (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively).Conclusion:Cycloplegia causes a hyperopic shift and astigmatism axis changes, along with an increase in central and paracentral corneal thickness and change in posterior corneal curvature. The effects of cycloplegia on refraction and corneal biometrics should be considered before cataract and refractive surgeries.

Summary A gasification pilot plant was built up in order to investigate the influence of both feedstock type and co‐gasification on the distribution and composition of the products. The results showed that at the same process condition, different feedstocks could result in different product yields. For instance, the highest gas yield was obtained from tire gasification, while the lowest one belonged to weed gasification. The characterization of the products showed the presence of different components and functionalities in the samples produced. In addition, the co‐gasification of the feedstocks resulted in the products with different specifications than single feeding, proving the existence of different reaction pathways. This means that feedstocks and their derivatives could interact with each other and resulted in nonproportional yields and composition for the char, tar, and gaseous products in comparison with the products from the gasification of the single feedstocks. As an example, the tar from co‐gasification had a lower content of acids but a higher content of amines and amides. This confirmed that co‐gasification influenced the reaction network significantly, impacting the formation of gases, tar, and char, originated from the cross‐interaction among the reaction intermediates derived from the pyrolysis/gasification of the various feedstocks.

No abstract