No abstract

Background and Objective: Over the past two decades enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways, which were established initially in colorectal surgery, have evolved and been adapted for other surgical disciplines. Goals include minimizing complications, optimizing recovery and an efficient return to preoperative baseline functioning. The introduction of ERAS pathways has led to both clinical benefits as well as cost savings. As these pathways consist of bundles of interventions throughout the perioperative period, the relative contribution of each individual component of these programs remains to be elucidated.The following narrative review article explores the application of ERAS principles to the thoracic surgery population. The evidence for individual components of these pathways will be discussed. Additionally, the introduction of prehabilitation interventions to the care of these patients will be explored. A brief case example is provided to illustrate how such interventions can aid in perioperative decision making.Methods: Medical computerized databases (PubMed and Cochrane Library) were searched for relevant reviews and guidelines published in English up to March 31, 2021, and hand searches of the references were performed. Articles were reviewed but no formal statistical analysis was undertaken.Key Content and Findings: Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative elements of ERAS pathways were examined. Some elements, such as smoking cessation, have fairly robust evidence of benefit, but questions still remain regarding optimal duration of intervention especially when weighed against surgical delay. Others, for example preoperative carbohydrate loading, may lack significant evidence of improved outcomes but have been adopted widely because of ow perceived risk of harm. Formal prehabilitation programs show promise, particularly in the lung resection population.Conclusions: Implementation of ERAS pathways has benefited thoracic surgical patients, however there is varying strength with regards to the evidence for individual components. There is an ongoing need to better define the roles of individual elements of these pathways and to further advance knowledge regarding the optimal ways in which to apply some of them.

The pharyngeal pack is routinely used in many nasopharyngeal surgeries to reduce the spillage of secretions into the trachea and esophagus. Here we report a case of migration of a pharyngeal pack into the stomach of a patient undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery and review risks of delayed recognition and the management of this complication. In this case report, we share our experience to reinforce and highlight the importance of proper documentation of pharyngeal pack insertion and removal to prevent easily avoidable morbidity and mortality. It also highlights the importance of an immediate esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (OGD) to retrieve the migrated pharyngeal pack as soon as its migration to the gastrointestinal tract is suspected.