Despite the common recommendation to wash the face twice daily with a mild cleanser, there is little published evidence to support the practice. Indeed, while the general public believes that cleaner skin will result in fewer blemishes, dermatologists often warn that overwashing and scrubbing can exacerbate the condition. To clarify the effect of frequency of face washing on acne vulgaris, we designed a single-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial to be conducted on males with mild to moderate acne vulgaris. Subjects washed their faces twice daily for 2 weeks with a standard mild cleanser before being randomized to one of three study arms, in which face washing was to be done once, twice, or four times a day for 6 weeks. At the end of the study no statistically significant differences were noted between groups. However, significant improvements in both open comedones and total noninflammatory lesions were observed in the group washing twice a day. Worsening of acne condition was observed in the study group washing once a day, with significant increases in erythema, papules, and total inflammatory lesions. We concluded that slight support exists, both in terms of efficacy and convenience, for the recommendation to wash the face twice daily with a mild cleanser. However, excessive face washing may not be as culpable as previously thought.
To assess the effect of exercise-induced sweat on truncal acne, a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled, institution review board-approved clinical trial was conducted on physically active males. Subjects were instructed to exercise long enough to break a sweat 5 days a week for 2 weeks. Group 1 did not exercise (n = 7), group 2 showered within 1 hour of exercise (n = 8), and group 3 waited at least 4 hours to shower after exercising (n = 8). No statistically significant differences in truncal acne were noted between (p = 0.84) nor within (p = 0.74 for group 1, 0.07 for group 2, and 0.09 for group 3) study groups at the end of the study period.
Purpose Although maximal resection of wild-type GBM tumors is associated with longer survival, the association of genomic alterations with the ability to resect disease has not been elucidated. This study aimed to determine whether certain molecular alterations are less amenable to surgical resection and whether achieving a surgical margin devoid of tumor cell burden provides a clinical benefit. Methods Molecular profiling of 148 consecutive tumor samples from newly diagnosed patients with IDH-WT GBM SNaPshot genotyping, and methylation-specific PCR for MGMT promoter methylation. The association of alterations with residual volume and progression-free survival was evaluated in regression analyses. We prospectively investigated the impact of TERTp status at the surgical margin on progression-free survival (PFS) in 47 patients. PFS and overall survival (OS) were evaluated with the log-rank test and Cox regression models.Results Overall, 148 patients (91 men [61.5%], median age, 62.5 years [range 56–70 years] had maximally safe surgery. The median follow-up duration was 18 months (IQR, 4-32 months). The rate of PFS was significantly lower in MGMT promoter unmethylated IDH-WT GBM amenable to resection with residual volume >4.9cc (hazard ratio [HR], 2.35; 95% CI, 1.44-3.84; P=.005). Gene amplification (PDGFRA, KIT, KDR) on 4q12 and TP53 and RB1 mutations were associated with greater RV. Prospective trial revealed median PFS for tumors with TERTp mutations in the surgical margin was 10.1 months while tumors with undetectable TERTp mutations in the margin did not progress (median follow-up 8.1 months, IQR 1.6-14.6). Surgical tumor margins devoid of TERTp mutations were associated with significantly different probability of PFS (0.23; 95%CI 0.15-0.43; P< 0.01)Conclusion In conclusion, 4q12 amplification (KDR/PDGFRA/KIT) and tumor suppressor gene alterations (RB1, TP53) were associated with greater residual volume. Tumor-free margins defined spatially by intraoperative navigation as assessed by quantifying TERTp mutation allelic fraction was correlated with prolonged PFS.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.