The lipopolysaccharides (LPS) of strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae grown in type 1 (T1) and 4 (T4) colony forms have been isolated. LPS from T4 colony type cells on mild hydrolysis gave a lipid A and a core oligosaccharide composed of 2-amino-2-deoxy-D-glucose, D-glucose, D-galactose, L-glycero-D-manno-heptose and 3-deoxy-D-manno-octuosonic acid that appeared to be common to all the strains examined. LPS from T1 colony type cells on mild hydrolysis gave a lipid A and high molecular weight O polysacc,arides which showed considerable differences in glycose composition for each strain examined. In those strains examined, T4 cells appear to produce a common "R" type LPS whereas T1 cells produce an "S" type LPS with structurally different O polysaccharide structures which probably account for serologically differentiated strains of N. gonorrhoeae.
Salmonella typhimurium hybrids expressing the S. typhosa antigens 9, d, and Vi were constructed by genetic crosses with an S. typhosa Hfr donor. The hybrids retained the same degree of mouse virulence as their S. typhimurium parent strain, the minimum lethal dose being less than 50 organisms when tested either in C57 black mice or Swiss white mice. Vaccination of the Swiss white mice with S. typhosa Ty2 vaccines prepared by acetone treatment, alcohol treatment, or heat-killing conferred significant protection against challenge by the hybrid strains but not against their S. typhimurium parent. Both the acetone-treated and alcohol-treated typhoid vaccines were markedly more protective than the heat-killed, phenol-preserved vaccine.
The antiserum agar method (ASA), which is based on the formation of immunoprecipitates around bacterial growth on agar containing meningococcal hyperimmune horse serum, was evaluated for serogroup identification of Neisseria meningitidis. Four hundred meningococcal stains were serogrouped by ASA employing horse antisera to serogroups A, B, C, Y, W135, Z, and 29E and compared to serogroup identification by bacterial slide agglutination (BA) employing rabbit antisera. Overall, there was 95% agreement between the two methods. The ASA proved to be more accurate than BA since 15 strains which cross-reacted with Y and W135 rabbit antisera by BA were specifically serogrouped as either Y or W135 by ASA. In addition, 5 out of 75 strains which were ungroupable by BA were serogrouped as either B or 29E by ASA. Repeat serogroup identification of 100 meningococcal strains by ASA provided identical results thus showing the reproducibility of the method. The ASA is advantageous to BA since it is more reliable, utilizes standard antisera which do not have to be absorbed to remove cross-reactions, does not require the preparation of standardized bacterial antigen, and is simple to perform.
An antiserum has been prepared in hens to R-type gonococcal lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and used in a simple slide-agglutination test for the identification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Anti-LPS serum agglutinated gonococcal cells representative of the four colony types of N. gonorrhoeae. Absorption of the antiserum with LPS removed the agglutinating activity. Secondary cultures (1120) were tested without observation of the colony type and all were agglutinated. No agglutination occurred with strains of Neisseria meningitidis, Neisseria lactamica, non-pathogenic Neisseria. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Branhamella catarrhalis, or with species of lactobacilli and Acinetobacter. Cross-reactivity of the antiserum occurred with some streptococci. The anti-LPS serum was used to identify N. gonorrhoeae in primary isolates from the cervix, urethra, and pharynx. Of 251 gonococcal isolates tested, 249 were agglutinated by the antiserum, while all of the corresponding second cultures were agglutinated. The antiserum did not agglutinate N. meningitidis found in primary isolates from pharyngeal specimens. Anti-LPS hen serum should be useful for the rapid identification of N. gonorrhoeae in primary isolates or secondary cultures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.