Study design A prospective, regional, population-based study.Objectives (1) Determine the mortality rate and factors associated with it 4 years after a TSCI and (2) The point prevalence of secondary medical complications of survivors at 4 years. Setting Communities of the Cape metropolitan area, South Africa. Methods All persons (n = 145) sustaining a TSCI from 15 September 2013 to 14 September 2014 were eligible for followup at 4 years. Participants were contacted after 4 years. The next of kin, via verbal autopsy, was used to establish cause of death. Those who were alive at 4 years were asked to indicate any secondary medical complications. Logistic regression techniques were used to identify independently associated risk indicators for death and development of secondary complications, respectively. Results Of the initial 145 persons, 87 were included and accounted for. Of these, 21 (24%) had died, 55 (63%) were alive and completed the survey, and 11 (13%) were classified as alive but did not submit the survey. The main cause of death reported was septicaemia (n = 7; 33%), followed by unknown natural causes (n = 7; 33%), then pressure injuries (n = 5; 24%). Out of the 55 persons alive, 89% had at least one medical complication at the time of enquiry, while more than 50% experienced 6 or more complications. The most common complications were pain (80%), muscle spasms (76%), sleeping problems (56%), and bladder dysfunction (44%). Conclusions Almost one-quarter of persons with TSCI have died 4 years after injury. Also, secondary complications were found to be highly prevalent at 4 years. This information could be used to develop secondary complications prevention programmes to reduce premature deaths.
Periodization models of exercise prescription are being used within a variety of population groups in the rehabilitation setting. Integration of periodization principles into a rehabilitation programme still however remains a challenge. Although there is a lack of consistency with regard to the structure and implementation of a periodized model of exercise prescription in the rehabilitation context, it seems to be an alternative way in which to prescribe exercise within the rehabilitation setting.
IntroductionThe upsurge in the use of clinical prediction models in general medical practice is a result of evidence-based practice. However, the total number of clinical prediction rules (CPRs) currently being used or undergoing impact analysis in the management of patients who have sustained spinal cord injuries (SCIs) is unknown. This scoping review protocol will describe the current CPRs being used and highlight their possible strengths and weaknesses in SCI management.Methods and analysisArksey and O’Malley’s scoping review framework will be used. The following databases will be searched to identify relevant literature relating to the use of CPRs in the management of patients who have sustained an SCI: PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), ScienceDirect, EBSCOhost, Medline, OvidMedline and Google Scholar. Grey literature as well as reference lists of included studies will be searched. All studies relating to the use of CPRs in the management of patients with SCIs will be included. Literature searches and data extraction will be performed independently by two groups of reviewers.Ethics and disseminationEthical clearance is not required for this scoping review study since only secondary data sources will be used. The findings of this review will be disseminated by means of peer-reviewed publication and conference proceedings. The final paper will be submitted for publication. Results of this review will also be presented at relevant conferences and disseminated to important stakeholders such as practicing physicians within specialised spinal care facilities within South Africa.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.