Most functional imaging data are collected in single session experiments; little is known about the reproducibility or test-retest reliability of the activation patterns found in these experiments. In our study, 15 healthy volunteers performed four simple motor-paradigms ("Hand", "Foot", "Mouth" and "Tongue") for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in 3 sessions on different days. Reproducibility of activations in four anatomical regions (pre- and postcentral gyri, paracentral lobule and the supplementary motor area) was measured in terms of voxels active in all sessions (common voxels) relative to voxels active in single sessions, giving reliability coefficients from 0 to 1. Two significance levels were used to identify active voxels. Reproducibility of activations was highest for foot and hand movements in the primary motorsensory areas; reliability coefficients were in the range of 0.62 to 0.78. Activations for mouth movements showed a very poor reproducibility. Application of the more stringent statistical threshold always led to a reduction of reproducible voxels. Reliability of fMRI data is not only a theoretical issue, but is of special practical importance in clinical settings such as integration of fMRI into neuronavigation for neurosurgical planning. Much care has to be taken if only single session data are available for interpretation.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Functional MR imaging (fMRI) is rapidly evolving and claims to complement or even substitute intraoperative mapping (IOM) of language functions. However, little is known about the reproducibility of imaging data in the language domain. The aim of our study was to assess the reproducibility of activations for 2 widely used paradigms: naming and word generation. Individual analysis was focused on the Broca area and the left insula.

The center of mass (COM) in functional MRI studies is defined as the center of a cerebral activation cluster. Although the COM is a well-accepted parameter for exactly localizing brain function, the reliability of COMs has not received much attention until now. Our goal was to investigate COM reliability as a function of the thresholding technique, the threshold level, and the type of COM calculation. Therefore 15 subjects were examined repeatedly using simple hand and tongue movement paradigms. Postprocessing was performed with uncorrected, corrected, and proportional thresholding as well as different threshold levels. Geometric and T-weighted COMs of left-hemispheric primary hand and tongue motor clusters were calculated. The COM variation was evaluated within and between repeated sessions depending on the different postprocessing setups. Mean COM variations over three repeated sessions varied between 1.6 mm and 9.8 mm for the hand paradigm and between 7.0 mm and 14.4 mm for the tongue task. Stringent thresholding techniques and high threshold levels were required to assess reliable results, whereas the kind of COM calculation was of lesser relevance. Thus, COM reliability cannot be presupposed; it depends strongly on the individual postprocessing techniques. This should be considered when using COMs for localizing brain function.

No abstract

No abstract