The protocol is managed as part of a local scheme and enables an appropriate response to a specific clinical profile by providing up-to-date multidiscipline follow-up care and a rapid solution should intercurrent events occur (signs of arousal, orthopedic deterioration, change of environment). Typical limitations are geographical remoteness and difficulties with family support care.

Latex hypersensitivity is a major cause of anaphylaxis during anaesthesia. Patients with spina bifida, health care or rubber industry workers have been considered at risk for latex sensitization. By analogy, the existence of other at-risk subsets of patients with latex exposure due to frequent surgical procedures has been suggested. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of latex sensitization in a cohort of adult patients with spinal cord injury and repeated latex exposure. Forty-two adult patients with spinal cord injury were studied and retrospectively compared to a group of 30 children with spina bifida evaluated using a similar protocol. Patients were administered a questionnaire concerning history of latex hypersensitivity, atopy, and surgical procedures. Latex sensitivity was investigated by skin prick-tests and latex-specific IgE assay. The search for atopy was based on in vivo and in vitro tests against a panel of environmental allergens. No chronic spinal cord injured patient had a history of latex allergy. When compared with spina bifida, the number of surgical procedures was not statistically different. Although not significantly different, the prevalence of atopy was higher in spina bifida patients. The high level of latex sensitization in spina bifida patients contrasted sharply with the absence of sensitization observed on both skin and in vitro tests in patients with spinal cord injury (P<0.0001). This study confirms that adult patients with chronic neurologic defects resulting from spinal cord injury exhibit a low risk of latex sensitization. These results suggest that considering adult patients with repeated surgical procedures as a group at risk for latex sensitization because of a high degree of latex exposure should be reexamined .

Objectives: To study different typolologies from visuo-verbal behavior concerning the arrest and the treatment of visual information in patients with spatial hemineglect. Methods: Ocular movements were monitored by photo-oculography in thirty controls and twenty-three patients with neglect. During a letter reading task, the movements, number of entries into predetermined zones of the visual field, time spent in each zone, and the verbal responses were recorded. Four profiles may be anticipated for such trials: normal scanning and reading (S+R+), normal scanning without reading (S+R−), absence of both scanning and reading (S−R−), abnormal scanning with reading (S−R+). Results: The letter projected in each of the 4 quadrants was scanned and correctly identified by all of the controls with no differences in scanning times. Among patients, the 4 possible behavior patterns were found along with differences in exploration duration per zone (p < 0.05) and number of times specific zones were attained (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our results confirmed the heterogeneity of the mechanisms of neglect and suggest that rehabilitation procedures adapted to each profile might be useful.

No abstract

No abstract