Multiparous beef cows were managed to achieve marginal (BCS = 4.7 ± 0.07; n = 106) or good (BCS = 6.6 ± 0.06; n = 121) body condition (BC) to determine the influence of forage environment on BW and BC changes, intramuscular fat percentage (IMF), rump fat (RF), and serum hormones during 2 yr. Cows within each BC were randomly assigned to graze either common bermudagrass (CB; n = 3 pastures/yr) or toxic endophyte-infected tall fescue (EI; n = 3 pastures/yr) during a 60-d breeding season. Blood samples were collected at d 0, 30, and 60 of the breeding season, and serum concentrations of prolactin (PRL), IGF-I, and cortisol (CORT) were quantified; PRL and progesterone (P(4)) also were quantified 10 d before the breeding season (d -10). Body weight and BCS were recorded during the breeding season (d 0, 30, and 60). Cow IMF and RF were measured via ultrasonography at the start and end of the breeding season. Cows with increased (>1 ng/mL) P(4) at the beginning of the breeding season (cyclic) had greater (P < 0.02) concentrations of PRL on d 30 and 60 compared with anestrous cows. A forage environment × BC interaction tended (P = 0.07) to influence PRL. Cows grazing CB independent of BC had increased PRL compared with cows grazing EI. Prolactin was decreased in good-BC cows grazing EI compared with cows grazing CB, and cows in marginal BC grazing EI had the least concentrations of PRL. Concentrations of IGF-I were similar (P > 0.10) among good- and marginal-BC cows grazing CB, as well as good-BC cows grazing EI; however, marginal-BC cows grazing EI had reduced (P < 0.04) concentrations of IGF-I compared with all other groups. Cows in marginal BC grazing CB gained (P = 0.02) the most BW during the breeding season, whereas good-BC cows grazing EI gained the least amount of BW. Marginal-BC cows grazing CB tended (P = 0.06) to increase BC during the breeding season, whereas good-BC cows grazing either CB or EI lost BC. Rump fat tended (P = 0.07) to increase during the breeding season in marginal-BC cows compared with cows in good BC. Calving rates were similar (P > 0.10) among good- (82%) and marginal- (84%) BC cows grazing CB, and good-BC cows grazing EI (79%); however, marginal-BC cows grazing EI had a reduced (P = 0.04) calving rate (61%). Cattle grazing EI during the breeding season lost BC. That reduction in BC may be communicated to the pituitary via hormones that include IGF-I or PRL or both, resulting in decreased calving rates.
BackgroundIntegration of behavioral observations with traditional selection schemes may lead to enhanced animal well-being and more profitable forage-based cattle production systems. Brahman-influenced (BR; n = 64) and Gelbvieh × Angus (GA; n = 64) heifers consumed either toxic endophyte-infected tall fescue (E+) or one of two nontoxic endophyte-infected tall fescue (NT) cultivars during two yr. Heifers were weighed at midpoint and termination of grazing. Grazing behavior (grazing, resting in the shade, lying, or standing without grazing) was recorded (n = 13 visual observations per yr in June and July) for each pasture. During yr 2, exit velocity (EV) and serum prolactin (PRL) were determined.ResultsGrazing behavior was influenced (P < 0.05) by an interaction between fescue cultivar and breed type. Gelbvieh × Angus heifers assigned to E+ pastures had the lowest percentage of animals grazing and the largest percentage of animals resting in the shade. Brahman-influenced heifers had faster EV (P < 0.001) than GA heifers (0.52 vs. 0.74 ± 0.04 s/m, respectively). Body weight (BW) was affected (P < 0.01) by an interaction of tall fescue cultivar and d, and an interaction of tall fescue cultivar and breed type. Heifers grazing NT pastures were heavier (P < 0.01) than heifers grazing E+ pastures at midpoint and termination. Gelbvieh × Angus heifers grazing NT pastures were heavier (P < 0.01) than GA and BR heifers grazing E+ and BR heifers grazing NT pastures. An interaction of forage cultivar and breed type occurred on serum PRL (P < 0.01).ConclusionCollectively fescue cultivar, EV, and concentrations of serum PRL were associated with grazing behavior. Heifers grazing NT pastures were observed to be grazing more than heifers assigned to E+ pastures, regardless of breed type, which may have contributed to changes in BW and average daily gain (ADG) in heifers. Integration of behavioral observations along with traditional selection schemes may lead to enhanced animal well-being and more profitable forage-based cattle production systems.
In the northeastern United States, pastures are predominantly cool-season perennial grasses and legumes that are dormant in the summer resulting in a decline in forage nutritive value and availability, commonly referred to as "summer slump." Strategies to alleviate summer slump may include stocking management or supplementation with or without an ionophore such as monensin to maximize efficiency. A 3-yr study (n = 32 cow-calf pairs; 718.0 ± of 83.9 kg) was conducted to evaluate the effects of rotational (ROT) or continuous (CONT) stocking method with or without monensin on forage production, pasture nutritive value, and animal production. Continuous and ROT stocking treatments were assigned to eight 2.9-ha pastures with two replicates/year for 56 grazing days during the summer. Treatments were arranged as a 2 × 2 factorial, and supplements included with or without monensin (200 mg cow −1 daily; Rumensin 90, Elanco Animal Health) delivered once daily (0.45 kg cow −1 ). Disk meter height was maintained using put-and-take animals with four tester cow-calf pairs per pasture. Carrying capacity (CC) and calf average daily gain (ADG) were not influenced by stocking management. Rotational stocking increased cow body weight (BW) change by 6.6 kg. Monensin improved CC by 9% regardless of stocking method but did not affect cow BW change or calf ADG. Based on this study, monensin can improve carrying capacity and stocking rate regardless of stocking method. Implementing rotational stocking may improve pasture health by suppressing weed growth and enhancing forage nutritive value in pastures containing cool-season perennial forages.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.