Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and alfentanil was associated with a significantly reduced rate of PONV and analgesic consumption, shortened recovery time and duration of hospitalization, accelerated onset of bowel movements, and increased patient satisfaction compared with desflurane and alfentanil in these patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery who completed the study.
SummaryBackgroundNosocomial infections are one of the most serious complications in intensive care unit patients because they lead to high morbidity, mortality, length of stay and cost. The aim of this study was to determine the nosocomial infections, risk factors, pathogens and the antimicrobial susceptibilities of them in intensive care unit of a university hospital.Material/MethodsThe patients were observed prospectively by the unit-directed active surveillance method based on patient and the laboratory.Results20.1% of the patients developed a total of 40 intensive care unit-acquired infections for a total of 988 patient-days. The infection sites were the lower respiratory tract, urinary tract, bloodstream, wound, and the central nervous system. The respiratory deficiency, diabetes mellitus, usage of steroid and antibiotics were found as the risk factors. The most common pathogens were Enterobacteriaceae, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida species. No vancomycin resistance was determined in Gram positive bacteria. Imipenem and meropenem were found to be the most effective antibiotics to Enterobacteriaceae.ConclusionsHospital infection rate in intensive care unit is not very high. The diabetes mellitus, length of stay, usage of steroids, urinary catheter and central venous catheter were determined as the risk factors by the final logistic regression analysis. These data, which were collected from a newly established intensive care unit of a university hospital, are important in order to predict the infections and the antimicrobial resistance profile that will develop in the future.
Ketamine improved the postoperative pain patient satisfaction, increased the maximal sensory level, and was associated with lower sedation scores in the first 15 minutes after administration. Group I was also associated with decreased total meperidine consumption and delayed the time to first recue analgesic administration. Coadministration of ketamine and midazolam did not provide any further benefit over ketamine alone.
Introduction: To evaluate the effects of periprostatic bupivacaine administration on pain control and analgesic consumption after transurethral prostate resection (TURP). Materials and Methods: The study included 40 male patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who underwent TURP, and they were divided randomly into two groups. All patients were operated under general anesthesia. The study group patients (n = 20) received periprostatic bupivacaine (0.5% 20 ml) injection (group I), and the control patients (n = 20) received only saline (NaCl 0.9% 20 ml) injection (group II). All injections were performed bilaterally into the periprostatic areas immediately after the TURP procedure via the transperineal route. In the postoperative period, all patients (groups I and II) received tramadol using a patient-controlled analgesia device. Postoperative pain was assessed and recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS) at postoperative hours 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 48. Total tramadol consumptions and additional analgesic requirements were also recorded and compared between groups. Results: There was no difference in demographic data between the two groups (p > 0.05). VAS scores of the patients at hours 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 12 were found to be significantly lower in group I than in group II (p < 0.05). Total tramadol consumption and patient-controlled analgesia demands of groups I and II were 153.5 ± 52.4 vs. 465.0 ± 55.1 mg and 17.1 ± 7.7 vs. 77.8 ± 7.5 mg, respectively (p < 0.001). No side effect was observed regarding bupivacaine injections. Conclusions: Periprostatic bupivacaine administration was a useful and safe method for postoperative pain control and reduced analgesic consumption in patients undergoing TURP.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.