This guideline offers recommendations on the diagnostic tests, treatment regimens and health promotion principles needed for the effective management of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection. It covers the management of the initial presentation, as well the prevention of transmission and future infection. The guideline is aimed at individuals aged 16 years and older presenting to healthcare professionals working in departments offering Level 3 care in sexually transmitted infections management within the UK. However, the principles of the recommendations should be adopted across all levels, using local care pathways where appropriate.
The objective was to determine how often gonococcal (GC) infection is accompanied by chlamydial co-infection and to determine risk factors for dual infection. All GC-positive cultures were identified between 24 April and 9 September 1998, among patients seen at the three genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics across the Chelsea and Westminster Directorate. Chlamydia trachomatis was diagnosed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Dade-Behring). One hundred and fifty-three episodes of gonorrhoea were identified. Information on chlamydial infection was available for 149 cases of GC of whom 16 (10.7%) were found to be co-infected with C. trachomatis. In univariate analysis, chlamydial co-infection was exclusively diagnosed in heterosexuals, and was more likely to be diagnosed among females, in younger individuals and in individuals of black Caribbean ethnic group. In multivariable analyses, however, only the sex and age of the individual were independently associated with chlamydial co-infection. The rate of co-infection was 10.7%. Independent risk factors were being less than 20 years old and being female.
Introduction: HIV remains a key public health issue. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence and British HIV Association guidance recommends that patients should be offered HIV testing when admitted to hospital or attending emergency departments (EDs) in areas with a prevalence ≥ 2 per 1000. We report a novel method of testing and the first 3-year results from our HIV ED testing programme utilizing biochemistry samples for HIV testing, with the aim of improving uptake while ensuring no changes to clinical practice in EDs. Methods: Routine ED HIV testing was implemented on 1 October 2018; it was initially opt-in and was subsequently changed to opt-out on 1 February 2019. HIV testing was added to all ED blood test order sets and was performed on the biochemistry samples of those aged 18-59 years. The age range was extended to include those aged 16+ years on 1 March 2021 along with a move to notional consent.Results: A total of 78 333 HIV tests were performed from an estimated 110 683 attendees who had bloods taken in the same age range, demonstrating an overall 69.5% testing coverage. On implementation of opt-out testing after the first 4 months, the proportion of tests increased (from 57.9% to 69%). After increase in age range to 16+ years and a move to notional consent, the overall testing coverage improved to 74.2%. Of 1054 reactive results, 728 (69%) were known people living with HIV, eight (0.8%) were not contactable, two (0.2%) re-tested elsewhere and three (0.3%) declined a re-test. A total of 259 falsepositives were determined by follow-up testing and 50 (4.8%) were newly diagnosed with HIV. An HIV diagnosis was suspected in only 22%, and 48% had never previously tested for HIV.Conclusions: An opt-out HIV testing programme with notional consent and using biochemistry samples within the ED is feasible, acceptable and provides an excellent opportunity to diagnose patients who do not perceive themselves to be at risk or have never tested before.
a b s t r a c tWe describe the case of an HIV-infected woman on anti-retroviral therapy presenting with sternal osteomyelitis caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Crown
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.