No abstract

No abstract

Background: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is nowadays the first choice for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones smaller than 2 cm, considering its low complications and high success rate.Aim: To present an update of the current situation of ESWL treatment and to analyse our series of patients and the efficacy of combined lithiasis treatment in different locations and sizes.Patients and Method: Retrospective study including patients with urolithiasis treated with ESWL between 2007 and 2019. Collected data included: gender and age at treatment, presentation symptoms, imaging studies, stone location and size, complications and stone clearance. Success was defined as stone-free status or the presence of clinically insignificant residual fragments (<4 mm after 3 months follow-up). Patients with residual stones larger than 4 mm after 3 months were programmed for another ESWL session or received a combined sandwich therapy, followed by URS or percutaneous approach.Results: Between 2007 and 2019, 37 patients presented a total of 41 lithiasis episodes that were treated with ESWL sessions. Median age at first procedure was 9 years old (1–17) and median follow-up time was 6 years (3–12). Stones were located in the renal pelvis, followed by the lower, middle and upper calyx, proximal ureter, and 51% of our patients had multiple lithiasis. Median stone size was 12 mm (5–45), the main component being calcium oxalate (34%). During immediate postoperative period, 8 patients (19%) presented complications: renal colic, hematuria and urinary tract infection. After the first ESWL, 41% of the patients (n = 17) were stone-free. Out of the 24 residual lithiasis episodes (58%), three patients (7%) underwent a second ESWL session. In the remaining 19 patients, ESWL was combined with URS or percutaneous approach to achieve complete stone clearance. Overall stone free status after combined therapy was 95% (n = 39).Conclusion: These data support that ESWL is an effective minimally invasive technique, with low cost and morbidity, reproducible and safe for the treatment of stone disease in children. Even though lithiasis size seems to be a significant factor in ESWL success, in combination with other lithotripsy procedures it can reach very high rates of stone clearance.

I. Bada Bosch et al.CIRUGÍA PEDIÁTRICA ResumenObjetivo. Evaluar la eficacia del tratamiento endourológico del ureterocele ectópico en niños en una serie amplia y con seguimiento a largo plazo.Material y métodos. Estudio retrospectivo descriptivo de los pacientes con ureterocele ectópico intervenidos en nuestro centro en los últimos 15 años. Todos los pacientes se tratan por vía endourológica, tanto el ureterocele como el reflujo vesicoureteral (RVU) postoperatorio.Resultados. Se trataron 40 pacientes, 55% eran izquierdos y 5% bilaterales. La edad media al diagnóstico fue de 4,97 meses siendo de diagnóstico prenatal el 54,1%. En todos los pacientes menos uno se realizó una punción endourológica del ureterocele. La edad media en el momento de la cirugía era de 6,96 meses (0-1,11). La cirugía fue ambulante en un 94,9% de los pacientes. No se registraron complicaciones perioperatorias. En los últimos 30 pacientes no se realizó cistouretrografía miccional preoperatoria. Un 72,5% de los pacientes presentaron RVU postoperatorio (44,8% a pielón superior, 10,3% a pielón inferior, 17,2% a ambos, 6,9% al sistema contralateral y 20,7% bilateral), pero este se resolvió con un único procedimiento endoscópico en un 48,1% de los casos (curación del 65% de los pacientes con dos procedimientos). El RVU no se resolvió de forma endoscópica en 3 pacientes que requirieron un reimplante ureteral. Seis pacientes precisaron heminefrectomía (n= 3) o nefrectomía (n= 3) por anulación funcional e infecciones.Conclusión. El tratamiento endourológico del ureterocele ectópico es una técnica poco agresiva invasiva que consigue la resolución de la obstrucción de forma ambulante permitiendo diferir la cirugía vesical (si fuera necesaria) fuera del periodo neonatal.

Objective. To assess the efficacy of the endourological treatment of ectopic ureterocele in children in a large series and with a long-term follow-up. Materials and methods.A retrospective, descriptive study of patients with ectopic ureterocele who had undergone surgery in our institution in the last 15 years was carried out. All patients were treated using an endourological approach, both for ureterocele and postoperative vesicoureteral reflux (VUR).Results. 40 patients were treated -55% with left involvement and 5% with bilateral involvement. Mean age at diagnosis was 4.97 months, with diagnosis being established prenatally in 54.1% of cases. In all patients but one, endourological puncture of the ureterocele was conducted. Mean age at surgery was 6.96 months (0-1.11). Surgery was performed on an outpatient basis in 94.9% of patients. No perioperative complications were recorded. In the last 30 patients, preoperative voiding cystourethrography was not carried out. 72.5% of patients had postoperative VUR (44.8% into the upper pyelon, 10.3% into the lower pyelon, 17.2% into both, 6.9% into the contralateral system, and 20.7% into the bilateral system), but it was resolved with a single endoscopic procedure in 48.1% of cases (65% of patients were healed with two procedures). VUR was not endoscopically resolved in 3 patients who required ureteral re-implantation. 6 patients required heminephrectomy (n=3) or nephrectomy (n=3) as a result of functional impairment and infections. Conclusion:The endourological treatment of ectopic ureterocele is a little aggressive and little invasive technique that allows the obstruction to be resolved on an outpatient basis, which means bladder surgery -if required-can be performed outside the neonatal period.