Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly moving from an experimental phase to an implementation phase in many fields, including medicine. The combination of improved availability of large datasets, increasing computing power, and advances in learning algorithms has created major performance breakthroughs in the development of AI applications. In the last 5 years, AI techniques known as deep learning have delivered rapidly improving performance in image recognition, caption generation, and speech recognition. Radiology, in particular, is a prime candidate for early adoption of these techniques. It is anticipated that the implementation of AI in radiology over the next decade will significantly improve the quality, value, and depth of radiology's contribution to patient care and population health, and will revolutionize radiologists' workflows. The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) is the national voice of radiology committed to promoting the highest standards in patient-centered imaging, lifelong learning, and research. The CAR has created an AI working group with the mandate to discuss and deliberate on practice, policy, and patient care issues related to the introduction and implementation of AI in imaging. This white paper provides recommendations for the CAR derived from deliberations between members of the AI working group. This white paper on AI in radiology will inform CAR members and policymakers on key terminology, educational needs of members, research and development, partnerships, potential clinical applications, implementation, structure and governance, role of radiologists, and potential impact of AI on radiology in Canada.

Lung morphology at zero end-expiratory pressure predicts the response to recruitment maneuvers. Patients with focal lung morphology are at risk for significant hyperinflation during the recruitment maneuvers, and lung recruitment is rather limited.

Purpose To evaluate the associations among mathematical modeling with the use of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-based texture features and deep myometrial invasion (DMI), lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and histologic high-grade endometrial carcinoma. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval was obtained for this retrospective study. This study included 137 women with endometrial carcinomas measuring greater than 1 cm in maximal diameter who underwent 1.5-T MR imaging before hysterectomy between January 2011 and December 2015. Texture analysis was performed with commercial research software with manual delineation of a region of interest around the tumor on MR images (T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic contrast material-enhanced images and apparent diffusion coefficient maps). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve and diagnostic performance of random forest models determined by using a subset of the most relevant texture features were estimated and compared with those of independent and blinded visual assessments by three subspecialty radiologists. Results A total of 180 texture features were extracted and ultimately limited to 11 features for DMI, 12 for LVSI, and 16 for high-grade tumor for random forest modeling. With random forest models, areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were estimated at 0.84, 79.3%, 82.3%, 81.0%, 76.7%, and 84.4% for DMI; 0.80, 80.9%, 72.5%, 76.6%, 74.3%, and 79.4% for LVSI; and 0.83, 81.0%, 76.8%, 78.1%, 60.7%, and 90.1% for high-grade tumor, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of visual assessment for DMI were 84.5%, 82.3%, 83.2%, 77.7%, and 87.8% (reader 3). Conclusion The mathematical models that incorporated MR imaging-based texture features were associated with the presence of DMI, LVSI, and high-grade tumor and achieved equivalent accuracy to that of subspecialty radiologists for assessment of DMI in endometrial cancers larger than 1 cm. However, these preliminary results must be interpreted with caution until they are validated with an independent data set, because the small sample size relative to the number of features extracted may have resulted in overfitting of the models. RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.