A randomized clinical trial comparing plaque removal efficacy of an oscillating-rotating power toothbrush to a manual toothbrush by multiple examiners Abstract: Objective: To determine whether multiple examiners can demonstrate consistent plaque removal advantages for an oscillatingrotating power toothbrush versus a manual toothbrush. Methods: This was a replicate-use, single brushing, examiner-blind, randomized, two-treatment, four-period crossover clinical trial involving four examiners. Subjects were randomized to one of four treatment sequences involving two toothbrushes: an oscillating-rotating power toothbrush or a manual toothbrush. At each of the four visits, subjects arrived having abstained from oral hygiene for 24 h prior, and brushed with their assigned toothbrush and a marketed fluoride dentifrice under supervision unaided by a mirror. Plaque was assessed by each examiner using the Turesky-Modified Quigley-Hein Plaque Index at each study period before and after brushing. Data was analysed separately for each examiner using the analysis of covariance for crossover design. Results: Ninety-five subjects between the ages of 18 and 70 met the entrance criteria and were enrolled in the study. Eighty-seven subjects completed all four periods of the study. Both brushes delivered a significant plaque reduction when compared to baseline. Significant treatment differences were observed for all four examiners -ranging from 0.10 to 0.16 -in favor of the oscillating-rotating brush (P < 0.001). There were no adverse events reported or observed for either brush. Conclusions: All four examiners demonstrated the power toothbrush removed significantly more plaque after a single brushing than the standard manual toothbrush. Both brushes were well tolerated.

Objectives This study aimed to evaluate if the Timed Test for Money Counting (TTMC) complemented with testing the range of shoulder motion by griping the backside of the neck (NG) predicts the ability of geriatric inpatients to perform effective plaque reduction by autonomously conducted oral hygiene. Material and methods This clinical validation study involved 74 hospitalized geriatric inpatients, 48 (64.9%) females, aged between 66 and 98 years (mean age 84.1 years). Oral health status was examined. Dental plaque was assessed with the Turesky modified Quigley-Hein Index (TI) on teeth and the Denture Hygiene Index (DHI) on removable dentures. The performance and duration of TTMC and NG were recorded. After autonomous tooth brushing and denture cleaning by the patient, dental plaque was scored again with the TI and DHI. Geriatric assessment data were collected from medical records. Results Forty-nine (66.2%) geriatric inpatients completed the TTMC&NG successfully. Passing the TTMC&NG was significantly associated with better plaque removal on teeth and dentures by autonomously conducted oral hygiene. The sensitivity of the TTMC&NG for above average plaque reduction was 86.4% on teeth and 77.8% on dentures. The test revealed a negative predictive value of 75.0% to detect below average plaque reduction on teeth and 72.7% on dentures. Conclusions The TTMC&NG served as a suitable predictor for the ability of geriatric inpatients to perform autonomously effective tooth brushing and denture cleaning. Clinical relevance This simple and short test might help the medical staff to identify geriatric inpatients unable to perform effective oral hygiene by themselves.