Panoramic and intraoral radiographs from 400 consecutive patients were compared for their ability to demonstrate periapical pathology and caries. Two hundred panoramic radiographs were exposed with the rotational technique and 200 with the intraoral X-ray tube technique. Periapical osteolytic and sclerotic lesions as well as approximal caries were recorded independently by two observes. Agreement with intraoral radiographs for periapical osteolytic lesions was, on average, 63% for the rotational and 55% for the intraoral X-ray tube technique and for sclerotic lesions 40% and 36%, respectively. The agreement varied with tooth type and lesion size. When teeth without periapical lesions were also included in the comparisons, the values for agreement were over 96%. Interobserver agreement for periapical osteolytic lesions was 61% for the rotational and 56% for the intraoral X-ray tube technique. The corresponding values for sclerotic lesions were 29% and 23%. Intraobserver agreement for periapical osteolytic lesions was 71% for the rotational and 67% for the intraoral X-ray tube technique. The corresponding values for sclerotic lesions were 46% and 56%. Agreement with intraoral radiographs for enamel caries was, on average, 21% for the rotational and 27% for the intraoral X-ray tube technique and for dentinal lesions 44% and 53%, respectively. When caries-free approximal surfaces were also included in the comparisons, the values for agreement were over 95%. It is concluded that panoramic and intraoral radiography perform equally well as diagnostic tools for the detection of periapical lesions, although the results are not identical.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

It has been suggested that information from the panoramic radiograph makes it possible to appropriately select supplementary intraoral radiographs to achieve a comprehensive examination of teeth and surrounding bone with less patient dose but no significant information loss. Number of intraoral radiographs selected, information loss and monetary costs with such a procedure was evaluated in 40 patients. Results show that, on average, 5.1 intraoral radiographs were selected to supplement the panoramic radiograph. Of these, 3.1 contained information different from that in the panoramic radiograph but 2.0 did not. An additional 3.4 ought to have been taken to reach the result of the 'gold standard' achieved from a simultaneous evaluation by two expert observers of panoramic radiographs and full mouth surveys with intraoral radiographs. Sensitivity for the combined use of panoramic and supplementary intraoral radiographs was high (80-96%, depending on type of teeth) as regards periapical lesions and marginal bone loss but low for caries (42-96%). Specificity was high for periapical lesions and caries (95-97%) but low for marginal bone loss (50-92%). In Sweden, patient costs become almost the same for a combination of panoramic radiography and 8.5 intraoral radiographs as for a full mouth survey comprising 20 intraoral radiographs. The radiation dose reduction is 40-50% considering that the dose from a panoramic radiograph approximately corresponds to 2-4 intraoral radiographs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The aims of this study were to evaluate the frequency of errors in panoramic radiographs in young orthodontic patients, to register pathologic and abnormal conditions, and to compare these findings with the patient's record. A total of 1287 panoramic radiographs of children and adolescents (530 boys and 757 girls; mean age 14.2 years) were analyzed. The radiographs were obtained of patients referred for orthodontic treatment during a 1 year period. Four observers evaluated the radiographs for 10 common errors, pathologies, and/or anomalies. Cohen's kappa was used for the calculations of inter- and intraobserver variability. Five of the errors were divided into clinically relevant or not clinically relevant errors, i.e. errors influencing diagnosis. Only those pathological findings with a possible influence on orthodontic treatment were compared with the patient's record. Of the 1287 radiographs, 96 per cent had errors. The number of errors in each image varied between 1 and 5, and in 24 per cent of these images, the errors could be of importance for clinical decision making. The most common error was that the tongue was not in contact with the hard palate. Pathologies or anomalies were found in 558 patients and a total of 1221 findings were recorded. Findings of possible relevance for orthodontic treatment were 63, and 12 of those were registered in the patient records. Pathological findings outside the dental arches were low and could be an argument for minimizing the radiation field.

Panoramic and intra-oral radiographs from 400 consecutive patients were evaluated for the assessment of the marginal bone height. Two hundred panoramic radiographs were exposed with the rotational technique and 200 with the intra-oral X-ray tube technique. Measurements of the approximal marginal bone level were independently performed by two observers. Complete agreement between panoramic and intra-oral radiographs was, on average, obtained in 55% and 49% of the sites, respectively. When the criterion for agreement was widened to include recordings with a difference of +/- 1 mm, the agreement was on average 87% irrespective of the techniques compared. The agreement varied with tooth type and severity of the marginal bone loss. Angular bony defects and furcation involvements were recorded separately. For angular bony defects there was a variation in agreement from 33% to 46% for the rotational technique and from 35% to 51% for the intra-oral X-ray tube technique depending on localization. Furcation involvements of the molars were equally recorded in 60% and 59%, respectively, but in only 12% and 28% for the upper premolars. Interobserver agreement was 58% for the intra-oral radiographs, 60% and 59% for the two panoramic techniques. Mean intra-observer agreement was 68%, 66% and 68%. It is concluded that panoramic radiography can often be used for the assessment of marginal bone loss alone, supplemented when necessary by intra-oral radiographs.

It was concluded that digital panoramic radiographs are equivalent to film-based images for most purposes.