Designing vehicles to protect occupants from explosive threats is complicated by the complex set of physics that occurs from the point of detonation to the response of the occupants. These physics include detonation chemistry, shock physics, solid mechanics, structural dynamics, nonlinear material behaviour, and human physiology and injury mechanics, among others. Consequently, vehicles are typically developed through an iterative process of destructive field testing in order to determine the level of blast protection. This testing is both time consuming and costly and does not ensure an optimized design. Recent advances in computational power and high-fidelity multi-physics computational tools now offer the alternative of performing Simulation-Based Design (SBD), similar to what is currently done for crash protection. Here, the explosive threat, its coupling to a vehicle, the vehicle structure, occupants or surrogates, and their coupling to the vehicle are all modelled in a single analysis. In this paper we describe an approach that applies state-of-the-art nonlinear finite element analysis to rapidly determine the survivability of vehicle designs and occupant injury potential when subjected to a buried charge or an above-ground improvised explosive device (IED). This integrated analysis capability allows iterative assessments to be performed as part of the design process. Modelling approaches for buried charges and IEDs and the coupling of the resulting loads on the vehicle are discussed. Finally, detailed sub-modelling of critical components such as occupant seating systems is demonstrated.
Designing vehicles to protect occupants from explosive threats is complicated by the complex set of physics that occurs from the point of detonation to the response of the occupants. These physics include detonation chemistry, shock physics, solid mechanics, structural dynamics, nonlinear material behaviour, and human physiology and injury mechanics, among others. Consequently, vehicles are typically developed through an iterative process of destructive field testing in order to determine the level of blast protection. This testing is both time consuming and costly and does not ensure an optimized design.Recent advances in computational power and high-fidelity multi-physics computational tools now offer the alternative of performing Simulation-Based Design (SBD), similar to what is currently done for crash protection. Here, the explosive threat, its coupling to a vehicle, the vehicle structure, occupants or surrogates, and their coupling to the vehicle are all modelled in a single analysis. In this paper we describe an approach that applies state-of-the-art nonlinear finite element analysis to rapidly determine the survivability of vehicle designs and occupant injury potential when subjected to a buried charge or an above-ground improvised explosive device (IED). This integrated analysis capability allows iterative assessments to be performed as part of the design process. Modelling approaches for buried charges and IEDs and the coupling of the resulting loads on the vehicle are discussed. Finally, detailed sub-modelling of critical components such as occupant seating systems is demonstrated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.