Background-In healthy subjects, continuous infusions of high dose ranitidine and omeprazole produce high intragastric pH values. Aim-To test the hypothesis that both drugs also maintain high intragastric pH values in patients with bleeding ulcers. Patients and Methods-In two parallel studies, 20 patients with bleeding duodenal ulcers and 20 patients with bleeding gastric ulcers were randomly assigned to receive either ranitidine (0.25 mg/kg/hour after a bolus of 50 mg) or omeprazole (8 mg/hour after a bolus of 80 mg) for 24 hours. Intragastric pH was continuously recorded with a glass electrode placed 5 cm below the cardia. Results-Both drugs rapidly raised the intragastric pH above 6. During the second 12 hour period, however, the percentage of time spent below a pH of 6 was 0-15% with omeprazole and 20.1% with ranitidine (p=0.0015) in patients with duodenal ulcer; in patients with gastric ulcer it was 001% with omeprazole and 46-1% with ranitidine (p=0-002). Conclusions-Primed infusions of omeprazole after a bolus produced consistently high intragastric pH values in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers, whereas primed infusions with ranitidine were less effective during the second half of a 24 hour treatment course. This loss of effectiveness may be due to tolerance. (Gut 1997; 40: 36-41)
This prospective study was designed to validate a novel biopsy urease test as well as a simplified 13C-urea breath test for the detection of Helicobacter pylori. In addition, the hypothesis was tested that both the reaction velocity of the urease test and the 13CO2 excess of the urea breath test may allow a prediction of the severity of gastritis. Seventy dyspeptic patients with unknown H. pylori status were included. The H pylori status was assessed by means of culture and histology after Warthin and Starry stain. One antral and one body biopsy specimen were separately analyzed by the novel biopsy urease test (HUT). Also, a 13C-urea breath test using 75 mg 13C-labelled urea and orange juice as test meal was performed in all patients. Forty-seven patients (67%) were H. pylori positive as judged from histology and culture. In 46 patients, H. pylori infection was also detected by the novel biopsy urease test and by the urea breath test as well (sensitivity 97.9%). False-positive results were not observed by either method (specificity 100%). Both the reaction velocity of the urease test and the 13CO2 excess of the breath test significantly correlated with H. pylori density and grade and activity of gastritis. The determination coefficients, however, indicated that both methods allow a reliable prediction of the severity of gastritis only in about 40-50% of the patients. In conclusion, the novel biopsy urease test and the simplified 13C-urea breath test proved to be highly accurate in diagnosing H. pylori infection. Despite a significant correlation, neither the reaction velocity of the urease test nor the 13CO2 excess of the breath test are clinically useful for the prediction of the severity of gastritis.
SUMMARYAim : To test the hypothesis that 1-week low-dose triple therapy for H. pylori is sufficient for relief from dyspeptic symptoms and healing of duodenal ulcers. Methods : Fifty-nine out-patients with duodenal ulcers and positive rapid urease test participated in this randomized, double-blind, two-centre study. All patients were treated for 1 week with omeprazole 20 mg b.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. and metronidazole 400 mg b.d. In a double-blind fashion, patients were then randomly treated for another 3 weeks with either omeprazole 20 mg once daily or an identical-looking placebo. Patients were investigated endoscopically before treatment for H. pylori, after 2 weeks and after 4 weeks. H. pylori infection was assessed by a "$C-urea breath test at the time of enrolment and 4 weeks after cessation of any study medication. Results : Fifty-two patients were included in the ' all
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.