ConditionKEY WORDS: second-order parabolic equation, uniformly elliptic operators, nonclassical elliptic boundary value problem, Hblder function space.Consider the following problem. Let f~ C R", n > 3, and let some coordinates w = (wl,..., w,~-l) be are uniformly elliptic operators, (b(x, t), g) > b0 > 0, b = (b~,..., bn), and ~ is the inward (with respect to f~) normal on F. Obviously, for r = qo(x)lr, system (1) is equivalent to the problem of finding a single function u(x, t) with boundary conditions containing second derivatives along the tangents to the boundary. Apparently, such a nonclassical boundary value problem was first stated in [1]. The elliptic version of this problem was treated in [2]. In [3] a similar problem was studied for the case in which the parabolic operator is given on the boundary FT, and in [4] a more complicated case of a quasilinear problem with a parabolic quasilinear operator on the boundary was treated. Finally, in [5] the fundamental solution of problem (1) was shown to exist in the half-space under some restrictions on the coefficients and the right-hand sides of the problem. Obviously, the fact that the boundary condition in (1) contains only an elliptic operator makes the linear version of the problem richer in content.The general scheme for proving the solvability of classical boundary value problems for parabolic equations (the Dirichlet problem, the Neumann problem) outlined in [6, Chap. 4], is based on the study of some model problems in the half-space, so that the properties of these model problems are then transferred to the case of an arbitrary domain and arbitrary coefficients from some classes. Following this idea, we obtain a boundary value problem in our case by freezing the arguments in the coefficients, discarding lower-order terms, and straightening a part of the boundary F, which leads to the following problem. It is required