Background Cancer patients are thought to have an increased risk of developing severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and of dying from the disease. In this work, predictive factors for COVID-19 severity and mortality in cancer patients were investigated. Patients and Methods In this large nationwide retro-prospective cohort study, we collected data on patients with solid tumours and COVID-19 diagnosed between March 1 and June 11, 2020. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality and COVID-19 severity, defined as admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and/or mechanical ventilation and/or death, was one of the secondary endpoints. Results From April 4 to June 11, 2020, 1289 patients were analysed. The most frequent cancers were digestive and thoracic. Altogether, 424 (33%) patients had a severe form of COVID-19 and 370 (29%) patients died. In multivariate analysis, independent factors associated with death were male sex (odds ratio 1.73, 95%CI: 1.18-2.52), ECOG PS ≥ 2 (OR 3.23, 95%CI: 2.27-4.61), updated Charlson comorbidity index (OR 1.08, 95%CI: 1.01-1.16) and admission to ICU (OR 3.62, 95%CI 2.14-6.11). The same factors, age along with corticosteroids before COVID-19 diagnosis, and thoracic primary tumour site were independently associated with COVID-19 severity. None of the anticancer treatments administered within the previous 3 months had any effect on mortality or COVID-19 severity, except cytotoxic chemotherapy in the subgroup of patients with detectable SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR, which was associated with a slight increase of the risk of death (OR 1.53; 95%CI: 1.00-2.34; p = 0.05). A total of 431 (39%) patients had their systemic anticancer treatment interrupted or stopped following diagnosis of COVID-19. Conclusions Mortality and COVID-19 severity in cancer patients are high and are associated with general characteristics of patients. We found no deleterious effects of recent anticancer treatments, except for cytotoxic chemotherapy in the RT-PCR-confirmed subgroup of patients. In almost 40% of patients, the systemic anticancer therapy was interrupted or stopped after COVID-19 diagnosis.

No abstract

Dose-dense regimens yield more frequent and severe nonhematological toxic effects than standard dose TEC regimen. Though grade 4 toxicity rates appear acceptable with the T-->EC regimen, the incidence of grade 3-4 events makes it difficult to recommend either dose-dense regimen for further investigation.

Rationale: Docetaxel has proven its efficacy in the management of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Schedules of docetaxel administration differ. This prospective phase II study was designed to reevaluate the activity and toxicity of docetaxel administered weekly at an optimal dose to a large cohort of HRPC patients. Patients and Methods: Sixty-four patients were treated with docetaxel 40 mg/m² i.v., administered weekly for 6 consecutive weeks followed by a 2-week recovery period. Three treatment cycles were planned in the absence of progression or toxicity. The principal end point was the biochemical response based on the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (a decline of more than 50% for at least 4 weeks). Secondary end points were objective response to measurable disease, survival and toxicity. Results: Toxicity was assessed in 64 patients. Toxicity was acceptable, with no toxicity-related deaths. Twenty-one percent of the patients developed grade 3–4 hematological toxicity. Sixty-four patients were evaluable for the PSA response. Forty-one patients (64%) achieved a decrease in PSA of >50%, 13 of whom had a PSA <4 ng/ml. Two out of 12 patients with measurable disease exhibited an objective response. With respect to PSA, the median progression-free survival was 29 weeks (95% confidence interval: 18–46 weeks). The global 1-year survival rate was 58%. Conclusion: Weekly docetaxel at a dosage of 40 mg/m² is a well-tolerated treatment, which has very promising activity on the reduction of PSA in metastatic HRPC. A large phase III study is underway.

No abstract