Background In the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, general and specialist Palliative Care (PC) plays an essential role in health care, contributing to symptom control, psycho-social support, and providing support in complex decision making. Numbers of COVID-19 related deaths have recently increased demanding more palliative care input. Also, the pandemic impacts on palliative care for non-COVID-19 patients. Strategies on the care for seriously ill and dying people in pandemic times are lacking. Therefore, the program ‘Palliative care in Pandemics’ (PallPan) aims to develop and consent a national pandemic plan for the care of seriously ill and dying adults and their informal carers in pandemics including (a) guidance for generalist and specialist palliative care of patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 infections on the micro, meso and macro level, (b) collection and development of information material for an online platform, and (c) identification of variables and research questions on palliative care in pandemics for the national pandemic cohort network (NAPKON). Methods Mixed-methods project including ten work packages conducting (online) surveys and qualitative interviews to explore and describe i) experiences and burden of patients (with/without SARS-CoV-2 infection) and their relatives, ii) experiences, challenges and potential solutions of health care professionals, stakeholders and decision makers during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The work package results inform the development of a consensus-based guidance. In addition, best practice examples and relevant literature will be collected and variables for data collection identified. Discussion For a future “pandemic preparedness” national and international recommendations and concepts for the care of severely ill and dying people are necessary considering both generalist and specialist palliative care in the home care and inpatient setting.

Between March 2002 and August 2003 as part of the research project "Patients as partners -- tumour patients and their participation in medical decisions" tumour patients undergoing palliative therapy (n=272) were interviewed and asked about their level of information, their desired place to die and whether they had prepared an advance directive. Furthermore, 72 relatives of deceased patients who had been looked after by the project's palliative care team were given a similar questionnaire including questions concerning their knowledge about disease and prognosis, the actual place of death and the relevance of advance directives. According to patients and relatives, information particularly about prognosis is unsatisfactory. Of the inter-viewed patients, 75% said they wanted to die at home and 15% in a hospital. According to their relatives, 36% of the patients looked after by the palliative care team had an advance directive. The survey of the relatives showed a significant relation between the preparation of an advance directive and dying at the desired place. According to the relatives, medical and health reasons, hope for an improvement up to the very end,acute worsening of the condition and deficits in medical care were important reasons for dying in hospital against the patient'swish. In future, advance directives should be used as an aid for communication and the planning of care. Therefore, cooperation between doctors and patients based on a partnership is necessary. The required competence in communication should be improved.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract