The influences of acute or chronic nicotine pretreatment on ethanol-induced changes on gastric secretion, mucosal blood flow (GMBF), and glandular mucosal damage were studied in anesthetized rats. Ethanol administration decreased gastric acid secretion and GMBF, which were accompanied by a marked increase in gastric mucosal damage. Acute nicotine incubation 2 or 4 mg dose-dependently elevated both the titratable acid in the luminal solution and the gastric secretory volume; it also prevented the depressive action on GMBF and gastric mucosal damage in ethanol-treated animals. Chronic nicotine treatment for 10 days reduced the inhibitory action of ethanol on gastric acid secretion; the higher dose (25 micrograms/ml drinking water) potentiated the decrease of GMBF and the ulcerogenic property of ethanol. However, chronic treatment with the lower dose (5 micrograms/ml drinking water) had the opposite effects; it also markedly increased the gastric secretory volume. It is concluded that acute nicotine pretreatment elevates, whereas chronic nicotine pretreatment differentially affects GMBF. These effects could account for their protective or preventive actions on ethanol ulceration. The increase in nonacid gastric secretory volume by nicotine could partially explain its antiulcer effect. Furthermore, the acid secretory state of the stomach appears unrelated to the ulcerogenic property of ethanol.
The role of vagus in the actions of different acid inhibitors on ethanol-induced gastric damage and mucosal blood flow (GMBF) changes was studied in anaesthetized rats, using an ex vivo stomach chamber preparation. Subdiaphragmatic bilateral vagotomy decreased the basal gastric acid secretion and GMBF; it also intensified ethanol-evoked lesions in the glandular mucosa. Misoprostol, omeprazole and cimetidine produced a similar degree of reduction in acid output. Misoprostol given subcutaneously (s.c.) (50 micrograms/kg), or added to the incubation solution (12.5 micrograms) for 15 min, markedly prevented ethanol-induced lesion formation and reduction in GMBF. The reversing effect of s.c. injection of misoprostol on either lesion formation or on GMBF reduction was attenuated by vagotomy. Omeprazole protected against lesion formation only when present in the incubation solution (12.5 mg) of ex vivo chamber preparations of both vagus-intact and vagotomized animals, but the effect was significantly less in the latter group. The drug also prevented the depressive action of ethanol in vagus-intact animals. Cimetidine pretreatment (50 mg s.c. or 12.5 mg in incubation solution), however, did not modify the effects of ethanol on lesion formation and the GMBF. The findings indicate that the three different types of acid inhibitors exert different actions on ethanol-induced gastric mucosal damage, although they produced similar inhibition of acid output. Vagotomy lowers the GMBF and attenuates the antiulcer action of misoprostol and omeprazole, especially when the drugs are given by the parenteral route.
The direct protective action of adenosine and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) was examined in an isolated gastric gland preparation in rabbits. Ethanol (8%, v/v) incubation markedly increased the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and number of non-viable glands in the preparation. Both effects were prevented by PGE2 preincubation in a concentration (10(-6), 1.4 x 10(-5) or 2.8 x 10(-5) M)-dependent manner. The protective action was smaller in adenosine-treated groups, and yet the highest concentration (10(-4) M) of the compound also significantly inhibited the cytotoxic effects of ethanol. These findings indicate that both adenosine and PGE2 possess cytoprotective action on gastric glands in rabbits, but the former compound exerts its action beyond physiological concentrations. It is concluded that endogenous PGE2, but not adenosine may act as an ulcer modulator in the stomach.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.