Purpose To evaluate the association and interaction of five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in three genes (CFH, ARMS2, and ARMS2/HTRA1) with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) in Chinese population. Methods A total of 300 nAMD and 300 PCV patients and 301 normal subjects participated in the present study. The allelic variants of rs800292, rs2274700, rs3750847, rs3793917, and rs1065489 were determined by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). Gene-gene interactions were evaluated by the data mining approach multifactor-dimensionality reduction (MDR) method. Results The risk alleles of CFH rs800292, rs2274700, ARMS2 rs3057847, and ARMS2/ HTRA1 rs3793917 showed significant difference between nAMD or PCV patients and controls (all Po0.01). The homozygosity of risk alleles for rs800292, rs2274700, rs3750847, and rs3793917 were significantly different between nAMD patients and controls (all Po0.01), and predisposed to PCV patients (all Po0.01). After cross-validation consistency (CVC) and permutation tests, the two-locus model rs2274700_rs3750847 has a balanced accuracy of 64.37% in predicting nAMD disease risk. The one-marker model, rs3750847, and two-locus model rs2274700_rs3750847 has a balanced accuracy of 66.07% and 65.89% in predicting PCV disease risk, respectively. Furthermore, CFH rs1065489 did not show significant association with nAMD (P40.01), but was strongly associated with PCV in Chinese patients (Po0.001).Conclusions In this study, we found that the interaction of ARMS2 and ARMS2/HTRA1 is significantly associated with nAMD, and the interaction of CFH and ARMS2 is pronounced in PCV development in Chinese population.

Objectives: To determine in vitro activities of gentamicin alone and in combination with ceftriaxone, ertapenem and azithromycin against multidrug-resistant (MDR) N. gonorrhoeae isolates. Methods: 407 isolates from Nanjing, China, obtained in 2016 and 2017, had minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) determined for gentamicin using the agar dilution method. Antimicrobial combinations were also tested in 97 MDR strains using the antimicrobial gradient epsilometer test (Etest); results ranging from synergy to antagonism were interpreted using the fractional inhibitory concentration (FICI). Results: All 407 gonococcal isolates were susceptible to gentamicin. MICs ranged from 2 mg/L to 16 mg/L. Synergy was demonstrated in 16.5%(16/97), 27.8%(27/97) and 8.2%(8/97) MDR strains when gentamicin was combined with ceftriaxone [geometric mean (GM) FICI; 0.747], ertapenem (GM FICI; 0.662) and azithromycin (GM FICI; 1.021), respectively. No antimicrobial antagonism was observed with any combination. The three antimicrobial combinations were indifferent overall. The overall GM MICs of gentamicin were reduced by 2.63-, 3.80- and 1.98-fold when tested in combination with ceftriaxone, ertapenem and azithromycin, respectively. The GM MICs of the three antimicrobials by themselves were reduced by 3-, 2.57- and 1.98-fold respectively, when each was tested in combination with gentamicin. No antimicrobial antagonism was observed with any combination. Conclusions: Gentamicin alone was effective in vitro against MDR N. gonorrhoeae and in combination with ceftriaxone, ertapenem or azithromycin. Combination testing of resistant strains, overall, showed lower effective MICs against gentamicin itself and each of the three antimicrobials when used in combination with gentamicin.

Background The postoperative outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the new generation of self-expanding valves (SEV) and balloon-expandable valves (BEV) remain uncertain. Methods We conducted a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity score-matched (PSM) studies to evaluate the performance of the new generation TAVR devices, with a focus on Edwards SAPIEN 3/Ultra BEV, Medtronic Evolut R/PRO SEV, and Boston ACURATE neo SEV. Our primary endpoints were mortality and complications at both 30 days and one year post-operation. Results A total of 4 RCTs and 14 PSM studies were included. Our findings showed no significant difference between SEV and BEV regarding 30-day and 1-year mortality rates. ACURATE SEV required less permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) at 30-day as compared to SAPIEN BEV, while Evolut SEV required a higher rate of PPI than SAPIEN BEV. The incidence of stroke, major or life-threatening bleeding (MLTB), major vascular complications (MVC), coronary artery obstruction (CAO) and acute kidney injury (AKI) did not differ significantly between the two groups. SEV had a larger effective orifice area (EOA) and lower mean transvalvular gradients (MPG) compared to BEV. However, there was an increased risk of paravalvular leakage (PVL) associated with SEV. Conclusions In terms of 30-day mortality, stroke, bleeding, MVC, AKI, CAO, and one-year mortality, there was comparability between the two valve types following TAVR. SEV was associated with better hemodynamic outcomes, except for a higher incidence of PVL. Compared to SAPIEN BEV, ACURATE SEV had a lower risk of PPI at 30 days, while Evolut SEV was associated with a higher risk of PPI. These findings underscore the importance of personalized valve selection.