To estimate genetic diversity of the residual northern populations of Oryza rufipogon, a total of 232 individuals from six populations were analyzed using microsatellites (SSRs). The O. rufipogon populations with different status included three from Dongxiang (Jiangxi Province) and three from Chaling (Hunan Province) in China. The 23 rice SSR primer pairs selected from the RiceGenes Database detected a total of 115 alleles, indicating that all the SSR loci were polymorphic in this study. The total gene diversity was 0.919 in the six O. rufipogon populations, and the Donxiang populations showed higher diversity than the Chaling populations. More significant genetic differentiation and less gene flow were found among the Dongxiang populations than those from Chaling. The two putative introgressed populations showed relatively high genetic variation. One in situ conserved population from Dongxiang had the lowest level of genetic diversity. The re-introduced population from Chaling restored about 90% of the genetic variation, compared with the original source population. It is concluded from these results that a relatively high level of genetic variation resided in the northern O. rufipogon populations and continued efforts of conservation of these populations are needed; and that the conservation of some Chaling and Dongxiang populations has been effective in preventing gene flow from cultivated rice. Introgression of cultivated rice demonstrated significant impacts on genetic variability of the O. rufipogon populations, and should be carefully considered in conserving this wild rice. This study also suggested that re-introduction to its original habitats is an effective approach to restore O. rufipogon populations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.