No abstract

Migraine animal models generally mimic the onset of attacks and acute treatment processes. A guinea pig model used the application of meta-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP) to trigger immediate dural plasma protein extravasation (PPE) mediated by 5-HT2B receptors. This model has predictive value for antimigraine drugs but cannot explain the delayed onset of efficacy of 5-HT2B receptor antagonists when clinically used for migraine prophylaxis. We found that mCPP failed to induce dural PPE in mice. Considering the role 5-HT2B receptors play in hypoxia-induced pulmonary vessel muscularization, we were encouraged to keep mice under hypoxic conditions and tested whether this treatment will render them susceptible to mCPP-induced dural PPE. Following four-week of hypoxia, PPE, associated with increased transendothelial transport, was induced by mCPP. The effect was blocked by sumatriptan. Chronic application of 5-HT2B receptor or nitric oxide synthase blockers during hypoxia prevented the development of susceptibility. Here we present a migraine model that distinguishes between a migraine-like state (hypoxic mice) and normal, normoxic mice and mimics processes that are related to chronic activation of 5-HT2B receptors under hypoxia. It seems striking, that chronic endogenous activation of 5-HT2B receptors is crucial for the sensitization since 5-HT2B receptor antagonists have strong, albeit delayed migraine prophylactic efficacy.

Background: For the diagnosis of diabetic kidney disease (DKD), quantitative albuminuria measurement using the albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) is recommended according to various guidelines. It can be measured either in specialized laboratories or using ACR point-of-care testing (POCT). This observational study aims at evaluating the effect of ACR POCT utilization on the DKD diagnosis and treatment management for glycemic control and blood pressure. Method: Data of 717 patients with diabetes (type 1 diabetes: n = 236; type 2 diabetes: n = 463; other diabetes forms: n = 18) were assessed in three centers. The impact of ACR POCT on DKD diagnosis and treatment management for glycemic control and blood pressure was assessed using a case report form. The assessment of ACR POCT utilization purpose and relevance for physicians was documented using a questionnaire. Results: Of all participants (n = 717), 39.1% had a confirmed/suspected DKD diagnosis. Hereof, 8.6% were newly diagnosed with DKD, and 9.9% were suspected with DKD based on the actual ACR POCT values. Within the group of patients with confirmed/suspected DKD (n = 280), treatment modification was performed in 46.1% of participants. A drug initiation with GLP-1 receptor agonists or SGLT2 inhibitors was performed in 11.1% or 8.9% of patients with confirmed/suspected DKD, respectively. Regarding the utilization purposes of ACR POCT, 100% of the physicians (n = 8) indicated using it to examine patients with diabetes with or without hypertension; 75% considered it very important for patients with diabetes. Conclusions: The implementation of ACR POCT may positively affect DKD diagnosis and subsequently allow better management of patients with diabetes.

No abstract