BackgroundHypogonadotropic hypogonadism is an important cause of male infertility and loss of secondary sexual characteristics. Gonadotropin replacement is mandatory for sexual function, bone health, and normal psychological status. This study is to compare the effectiveness of different gonadotropin therapy modalities in the management of male hypogonadism. MethodsA randomized open-label prospective study of 51 patients attended the Faiha Specialized Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolism Center (FDEMC) with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, divided randomly into three groups. The first group was treated with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) alone, the second group was treated with a combination of both hCG and human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG), while the third group started with hCG alone then followed by combination therapy after six months. ResultsAll modalities of therapy result in a significant increase in mean testicular volume although no clinically significant difference between the groups, but the combination group had the highest increment. The increment in serum testosterone level was statistically significant among the different groups of treatment (p-value < 0.0001). When comparing groups, a higher mean maximum testosterone level (710.4±102.7 ng/dL) was obtained with the combination group followed by the sequential group, with mean maximum testosterone levels (636.0±68.6 ng/dL) (p-value = 0.031). Factors negatively affecting testosterone level include BMI > 30 kg/m 2 , initial testicular volume < 5 mL, and duration of therapy < 13 months. ConclusionsInduction of puberty using recombinant hCG alone is sufficient to induce secondary sexual characteristics, while for fertility issues combination from the start or sequential therapy has better for spermatogenesis. There was no effect of prior exogenous testosterone treatment on final spermatogenesis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.