Introduction Mitral valve abnormalities in rheumatic heart disease commonly lead to functional tricuspid regurgitation. Tricuspid annuloplasty (TA) is often performed in these cases along with mitral valve replacement (MVR). Our aim was to compare the perioperative morbidity and mortality among those patients that underwent mitral valve replacement with tricuspid annuloplasty versus those that underwent isolated mitral valve replacement. Methods A retrospective analysis of 158 patients that underwent mitral valve replacement, with or without tricuspid annuloplasty, secondary to rheumatic heart disease between January 2017 and August 2020. Patients who underwent additional cardiothoracic surgical procedures (aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting) were excluded to reduce confounders. Results The study group consisted of 158 patients (mean age 41; 73 male, 85 female) that underwent MVR with TA (n=22; 13.9%) or without TA (n=136; 86.1%). Both groups had similar comorbidity frequencies and medication history. Preoperative echocardiography showed a comparable degree of pulmonary hypertension and ejection fraction between the two groups. The TA+MVR group had similar intraoperative (81.8% vs 66.9%; p=0.161) and postoperative (45.5% vs 45.6%; p=0.991) blood products usage compared to the MVR only group. Concurrent TA resulted in similar in-hospital mortality (4.5% vs 4.4%; p=0.977) as well as early postoperative complications, namely, prolonged ICU stay (13.6% vs 10.3%; p=0.639), prolonged ventilation (0 vs 2.2%; p=0.482), re-intubation (9.1% vs 2.9%; p= 0.161), and reopening for bleeding tamponade (0 vs 5.1%; p=0.276).
To determine the incidence of endotracheal reintubation, excluding surgical reopening, in post-cardiac surgical patients in a tertiary care hospital. Material and methodsA retrospective descriptive analysis of 408 patients who underwent different cardiac surgeries during this period. Post-operative extubation was performed when patients fulfilled the preset criteria for extubation, which include consciousness (awake and aware), stable vital signs, acceptable arterial blood gases, acceptable respiratory mechanics, a maximum inspiratory force greater than 20-25 cm H 2 O, chest tube drainage less than 100 ml per hour, normal temperature and electrolytes. The total number of patients who were reintubated within 72 hours of extubation was noted. The criteria for reintubation included altered conscious level with Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of less than 8, respiratory failure, unstable hemodynamics, and arrhythmias such as ventricular tachycardia (VT) and fibrillation. All of the information was collected retrospectively on a specifically prepared form. Data was entered and evaluated in Statistical Package for the Social Sciences.
IntroductionRe-explorations after open-heart surgery are often required if the patient is bleeding or shows features of cardiovascular instability and does not improve with conservative measures. Our study aims to determine whether timely re-exploration of patients who are bleeding has an impact on the morbidity and mortality of the patients. MethodsA retrospective analysis of 75 patients that underwent open-heart surgery and subsequently underwent chest re-exploration for excessive bleeding between March 2018 and March 2020. Patients who were reopened post-op for indications other than excessive bleeding were excluded. ResultsA total number of cases were 700, out of which 75 (9.3%) patients were reopened, as compared to the literature, which shows worldwide 2-11% being reopened. Post-operative drain output was 1000ml to 1500ml in 47 (62.7%) and more than 1500ml in 28 (37.3%) patients before they were reopened. In 67 (89.3%) patients, three to five units of blood were transfused, and in eight (10.7%) patients, more than five units of blood were transfused. We believe our mortality in the reopened patients was low, because of timely intervention and early re-exploration, and is probably the reason why our figures land in a higher range (2-11%) of reopened cases (9.3%). Reopening time was less than five hours in 49 (65.3%) patients and less than 10 hours in 26 (34.7%) patients in our study. We tried to minimize the loss of blood and re-explored the patients before they lose excessive blood, the average time for reopening in our study was less than 10 hours. The average intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 4.2 days (range three to six days). Wound infections were reported in one of three patients. There was no mortality in these patients. Surgical site of bleeding was identified in 54 (72%) patients and no particular site was found in 21 (28%) patients. Suggesting that it is common to have a surgical bleeder than coagulopathy induced bleeding in post-cardiac surgery patients ConclusionsWe believe our low mortality (0%) is due to early reopening in patients who are bleeding excessively after cardiac surgery.
A unique case of an abdominal aortic aneurysm replacement in a young man of Caribbean descent is presented. The initial working diagnosis was of a mycotic aneurysm, which has recently shown resurgence with intravenous drug abuse. Blood tests and subsequent biopsy ruled that out. There was also a clinical suspicion of a connective tissue abnormality. Histological examination of the aneurysm, skin biopsy, and blood tests also ruled out this possibility. The graft used in this patient was from a new generation of grafts. In the absence of any studies on such grafts, there is the question of long term durability of the graft.
Background: Majority of the patients presenting for coronary artery bypass surgery are preoperatively on clopidogrel and aspirin i.e., Dual antiplatelets therapy (DAPT) because of high incidence of left main stem disease, acute coronary syndrome and diffuse coronary artery disease. Preceding coronary stenting and coming from far flung areas even from other countries with poor socioeconomic status contributes to continuation of DAPT till surgery. The main objective of the study was to evaluate hospital complications like chest tube output, re-explorations, blood, and blood product administration and in-hospital mortality in patients who continued DAPT till 48 hours prior to surgery versus those who continued DAPT until 48 to 120 hours before surgery. Methods: Preoperative history, perioperative and postoperative data of patients was gathered retrospectively from 1st July to 31st December 2019 in a tertiary care hospital of Peshawar. Total patients undergoing CABG Surgery were 223. From those 223 patients 192 patients were on DAPT. We than divided the 192 patients into two groups, Group A and Group B. 102 patients (Group A) received clopidogrel plus aspirin until 48 hours before surgery, and 89 patients (Group B) continued clopidogrel 48 to 120 hours prior to surgery. Chest tube output, need for exploration, in-hospital mortality, and blood or products transfusions among both groups were compared. Results: In terms of bleeding complications no significant difference between the both groups with similar chest drainage in the first 24 hours (602 ml and 609ml). In group A 33 patients received blood transfusion compared to 25 patients from group B. There was no significant difference in the amount of platelets given to group A (0.63 L) and to group B was (0.60 L). On the other hand, Group, A received 1.08 L fresh frozen plasma (FFPs) transfusion and group B 1.10 L respectively. Re-exploration was observed in Group A and B as (3 vs 2). Mortality was observed in 7 patients from group A and 2 from Group B. Conclusions: Usage of Dual antiplatelets therapy (DAPT) before surgery was an effective treatment method for postoperative complication of bleeding. It was suggested that with proper management with DAPT before surgery was planned is an effective and safe treatment method.. Keywords: Cardiopulmonary surgery, Coronary bypass grafting, hemoglobin, platelets, bleeding.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.