Accessory extensor tendons in the hand are not rare, usually asymptomatic, and recognized incidentally during elective surgery or cadaveric dissection. This report describes a novel case of symptomatic duplication of accessory extensor tendons to both the thumb and the index finger causing a painful dorsal wrist tenosynovitis. Excision of the accessory tendons with decompression and tenosynovectomy of the fourth extensor compartment alleviated the patient’s symptoms without compromising motion or function.
Background Distal radius fractures represent some of the most common injuries to the upper extremity, yet current evidence demonstrates great variability in the management of this injury. Elderly patients, in particular, stand to benefit from the early mobilization provided by operative fixation with a volar bearing plate. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review on all patients 65 years or older who underwent unilateral open reduction internal fixation of distal radius fractures using a volar bearing plate at a single institution between January 2014 and January 2016. We excluded patients with bilateral injuries, multiple fractures, and major injuries to the same extremity. Results Fifty-five patients met criteria for this study. By AO classification, we repaired 17 type A, 24 type B, and 14 type C fractures. At final radiographic measurements, average radial height compared with ulna measured −0.31 mm, average radial inclination measured 20.45 degrees, and average volar tilt measured 7.11 degrees. On discharge, 36 patients had wrist range-of-motion data consistent with a functional wrist. Four patients had limitations in the flexion/extension plane, 8 with radial-ulnar deviation, and 7 had limitations in both planes. Conclusions Distal radius fractures in the elderly may successfully be treated with a volar bearing plate. Useful strategies include supraperiosteal dissection of the radius from the pronator quadratus, use of a longer plate for stronger proximal fixation in osteoporotic bone, and regional block. This methodology allows for a safe procedure facilitating the early return of hand and wrist function.
Background The hand is highly visible and contributes to an individual's aesthetic image and perceived age. Current perspectives on hand aesthetics are primarily based on expert opinion rather than on lay population perspectives, which are less understood. Our study explores general population perceptions on the features that contribute most to an attractive hand. Methods Participants rated the attractiveness of 20 standardized hands as well as the appearance based on each characteristic: freckles, hair presence, skin tone, wrinkles, vein appearance, and soft tissue volume. The relative importance of each feature was assessed by comparison with overall attractiveness scores through multivariate analysis of variance. Results A total of 223 participants completed the survey. Soft tissue volume (r = 0.73) was most strongly correlated with overall attractiveness, followed by wrinkles (r = 0.71), skin tone consistency (r = 0.69), veins (r = 0.65), freckles (r = 0.61), and hair (r = 0.47). Female hands were perceived as more attractive, with a mean rating of 4.7 of 10, compared with 4.4 in males (P < 0.001). Participants correctly identified the gender of 90.4% of male hands and 65.0% of female hands. Age was strongly inversely correlated with attractiveness (r = −0.80). Conclusions Soft tissue volume is the most important factor in lay perception of hand aesthetics. Female and younger hands were perceived as more attractive. Hand rejuvenation may be optimized by prioritizing soft tissue volume with filler or fat grafting, with secondary priority on resurfacing to address skin tone and wrinkling. An understanding of the factors most important to patients in aesthetic appearance is critical to achieving a pleasing result.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.