This article analyses the democracy/security nexus by looking at how autocratic rule guides popular opinion in what have come to be known as “frozen conflicts”. In tackling the role of democracy in security, we draw on the concepts of “securitization” and “desecuritization”. Based on the studies of Buzan, Waever and Aradau, we extend current approaches to desecuritization by indicating how democratic systems can unleash emancipatory social processes. This helps us understand not only the limited nature of de-securitization by autocrats, but also the impediments that autocratic rule presents to de-securitization from below. Besides direct limits placed on political freedoms, autocratic governments can prevent the liberalization and modernization of views in society through economic control and reproduction of the dominant socio-economic structures. Based on an uncommonly wide range of interviews, this article shows how a broader set of views affects the views on conflict and its resolution.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.