We have developed a new introduction to the computer science major, consisting of two courses, called Science of Computing 1 and Science of Computing 2. This sequence emphasizes balanced development of basic abilities in all three of computer science's fundamental methods of inquiry (design, theory, and empirical analysis), as opposed to the more traditional emphasis on programming and data structures. Science of Computing 1 introduces students to all three methods of inquiry, in the context of recursive algorithms and their mathematical and experimental analysis. Science of Computing 2 extends, and provides extensive practice in, all three methods. Both courses use a strongly hands-on approach to demonstrate the importance of, and interactions between, the three methods of inquiry. Preliminary results indicate that these courses successfully teach basic design, theory, and empirical analysis, and encourage students to continue studying computer science at a rate as high as or higher than that of traditional introductory courses.
Computer science is a ftmdamentally creative endeavour. The creativity necessary for science is not produced through a knowledge of many facts, but through deep insight into the relationships between facts and the methods of inquiry through which they are discovered. The goal of computer science education should be the development of insight into the methods and nature of the discipline, not simply exposure to its current factual content. Unfortunately, few aspects of insight are explicitly addressed in any standard curricula. We call for, and present an outline for, a curricula based on insight rather than topics.
The benefits of engaging undergraduate students in research are numerous and well-known. Therefore, many schools are encouraging undergraduate research. However, carrying out undergraduate research in a liberal arts school can be challenging -liberal arts schools usually lack the resources typically available in larger research universities; the research programs of faculty at such schools are often insular; undergraduates may not always be adequately prepared or motivated for research; and research is only one of the many activities competing for the time and energy of undergraduate students. The objective of this panel is to discuss how undergraduate research can be successfully carried out in liberal arts schools in spite of all these constraints. We want to examine the mechanics of undergraduate research in such an environment -which practices work and which do not.The mechanics of undergraduate research include: How do we attract students to participate? How do we select students? What level of students? Do we train students in the research process? If so, what works? How do we select a topic appropriate for undergraduate research? Who does so? How do we circumscribe its scope? What kinds of activities are suitable as undergraduate research? When should students engage in research? Should we impose a research regimen on the students? If so, what works? How do we monitor the progress of research? What reporting mechanisms work? How do we keep students motivated? How do we encourage critical and independent thinking? How do we evaluate student research, and reward it? What are some avenues for disseminating student research? How do we train students to document their work, write up the results and present their research? What official mechanisms (courses/credits/internships, etc.) can we use to institutionalize research? How do we fund the research with or without external support? How can we ensure that the work done by the students can be reused and built upon once they leave? What can we do to build a research community among undergraduate students, complete with community spirit and structures for mutual support?The panelists represent a diversity of viewpoints: externally funded versus unfunded research, formal versus informal research regimen, independent versus course-based research, and modular versus ongoing research, to name a few. However, all the panelists are from small-to-medium-sized liberal arts colleges and have considerable experience supervising undergraduate research. In their statements, the panelists have listed six or more lessons that they have learned from experience. During the panel, the panelists will elaborate on these lessons and illustrate them with anecdotes. The panel will include time for the audience to share their experiences, and raise additional issues and concerns. We expect the panel to result in a well-rounded discussion of the mechanics of undergraduate research, and include multiple viewpoints and contrasting experience reports.
As the American work force approaches the second millennium,
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.