BackgroundIntravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (r-tPA) and urokinase (UK) are both recommended for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) in China, but with few comparative outcome data being available. We aimed to compare the outcomes of these two thrombolytic agents for the treatment of patients within 4.5 hours of onset of AIS in routine clinical practice in China.MethodsA pre-planned, prospective, nationwide, multicentre, real-world registry of consecutive patients with AIS (age ≥18 years) who received r-tPA or UK within 4.5 hours of symptom onset according to local decision-making and guideline recommendations during 2017–2019. The primary effectiveness outcome was the proportion of patients with an excellent functional outcome (defined by modified Rankin scale scores 0 to 1) at 90 days. The key safety endpoint was symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage according to standard definitions. Multivariable logistic regression was used for comparative analysis, with adjustment according to propensity scores to ensure balance in baseline characteristics.ResultsOverall, 4130 patients with AIS were registered but 320 had incomplete or missing data, leaving 3810 with available data for analysis of whom 2666 received r-tPA (median dose 0.88 (IQR 0.78–0.90) mg/kg) and 1144 received UK (1.71 (1.43–2.00)×104 international unit per kilogram). There were several significant intergroup differences in patient characteristics: r-tPA patients were more educated, had less history of stroke, lower systolic blood pressure, greater neurological impairment and shorter treatment times from symptom onset than UK patients. However, in adjusted analysis, the frequency of excellent outcome (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.40, p=0.052) and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.47, p=0.344) were similar between groups.ConclusionsUK may be as effective and carry a similar safety profile as r-tPA in treating mild to moderate AIS within guidelines in China.Registrationhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov. unique identifier: NCT02854592.
Objective Stroke patients often came late to hospital and arrived beyond the therapeutic time window for thrombolytic therapy. We studied the time from stroke onset to arrival at Accident and Emergency (A&E) department and examined what barred them from early medical attendance. Methods All acute stroke patients attending A&E between 15 March 1999 to 14 June 1999 were recruited. For those brought in by ambulance, their time intervals were divided into three: phase I was between stroke onset to call 999; phase II was between call 999 to A&E arrival; and phase III was between A&E arrival to being seen by doctor. For those who did not come by ambulance, they were divided into two groups: those who consulted other doctors and those who did not consult other doctors before coming to A&E. Their time lags from stroke onset to A&E consultation were compared. Results One hundred and fifteen stroke patients were consecutively recruited. Sixty-five ambulance users had median time for phase I as 151 minutes, for phase II as 32 minutes, for phase III as 17 minutes. The total median time lag was 190 minutes. Fifty were ambulance non-users. For those who did not consult other doctors before A&E attendance, the median time lag was 641 minutes. For those who consulted others doctors before A&E attendance, their median time lag was 3,672 minutes. As a group their median time lag was 950 minutes. For the 65 ambulance users, we further studied the time intervals between A&E arrival and being seen by doctors; and the median waiting time for doctors was 17 (range 0 to 60) minutes. Conclusions Public education was of paramount importance. Some common stroke signs could be widely propagated for recognition. Phase I should be less than 80 minutes. The median time for phase II would likely remain to be 32 minutes. Further shortening could be achieved in phase III. As category III & IV patients were most likely potential candidates for thrombolysis, they should be seen within 15 minutes. This would leave only 53 minutes for clinical assessment, CT brain and preparation of thrombolytic agent. These measures could increase the chance of providing thrombolytic treatment within the therapeutic time window.
Introduction: This aim of this study was to delineate current clinical scenarios of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDN) and associated anxiety and depression among patients in Mainland China, and to report current therapy and clinical practices. Methods: A total of 1547 participants were enrolled in the study between 14 June 2018 and 11 November 2019. Recruitment was conducted using a multilevel sampling method. Participants' demographics, medical histories, glucose parameters, Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questionnaire (DN4) scores, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) scores, Generalised Anxiety Disorder
Background Early neurologic improvement (ENI) after intravenous thrombolysis is associated with favorable outcome, but associated serum biomarkers were not fully determined. We aimed to investigate the issue based on a prospective cohort. Methods In INTRECIS study, five centers were designed to consecutively collect blood sample from enrolled patients. The patients with ENI and without ENI were matched by propensity score matching with a ratio of 1:1. Preset 49 biomarkers were measured through microarray analysis. Enrichment of gene ontology and pathway, and protein-protein interaction network were analyzed in the identified biomarkers. Results Of 358 patients, 19 patients with ENI were assigned to ENI group, while 19 matched patients without ENI were assigned to Non ENI group. A total of nine biomarkers were found different between two groups, in which serum levels of chemokine (C-C motif) ligand (CCL)-23, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand (CXCL)-12, insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-6, interleukin (IL)-5, lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor (LYVE)-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-AA, suppression of tumorigenicity (ST)-2, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α were higher in the ENI group, compared with those in the Non ENI group. Conclusions We found that serum levels of CCL-23, CXCL-12, IGFBP-6, IL-5, LYVE-1, PAI-1, PDGF-AA, ST-2, and TNF-α at admission were associated with post-thrombolytic ENI in stroke. The role of biomarkers warrants further investigation. Trial registration Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; identifier: NCT02854592.
BackgroundSymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) after intravenous thrombolysis is closely related to the poor outcome of stroke.AimsTo determine the serum biomarkers associated with sICH based on the INTRECIS study.MethodsEnrolled patients with sICH and without any ICH were matched by propensity score matching with the ratio of 1:1. Preset 49 biomarkers were measured by protein microarray analysis. Gene Ontology and Pathway Enrichment Analysis and protein-protein interaction network (PPI) were analyzed in the identified biomarkers.ResultsOf the consecutive 358 patients, eight patients occurred with sICH, which was assigned as an sICH group, while eight matched patients without any ICH were assigned as a Non-sICH group. A total of nine biomarkers were found significantly different between groups, among which the levels of interferon (IFN)-γ and interleukin (IL)-4 were higher, while the levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (IGFBP)-6, lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor (LYVE)-1, matrix metalloprotein (MMP)-2, plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1, and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-AA were lower in the sICH group compared with those in the Non-sICH group.ConclusionsOur finding indicated that baseline serum CRP, GDNF, IFN-γ, IGFBP-6, IL-4, LYVE-1, MMP-2, PAI-1, and PDGF-AA levels were associated with post-thrombolytic sICH in stroke.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.