At present, the engineering designers generally design and analyze the precast structural models according to the equivalent cast-in-situ principle, and have a vague understanding of non-identical problems. However, these issues cannot be ignored, especially for high-intensity areas. This paper considers the differences of the hysteretic relationship between two typical precast joints and cast-in-situ (RC) joints, and researches the influence of these differences on the seismic response of frame structures. For the monolithic precast joint, the force mechanism was analyzed based on its assembly form, and the differences with the RC joint in the testing phenomena were explained accordingly. The dimensionless hysteresis models of two types of joints were proposed, and the rationality of the monolithic precast joint model was verified according to the existing experimental results. Different performances of joints were realized by assigning the constitutive models calculated from sectional reinforcement to the spring elements of analysis models. Considering two possible performance deficiencies of each type of precast joint separately, a total of seven structural analysis models were formed. Nonlinear static analysis and dynamic time-history analysis methods were adopted to reveal the differences between precast frames and the RC frame in terms of structural capacity curve, displacement response, ductility demands of components and structural residual deformation. The results showed that under strong seismic excitation, the response differences between precast frames and the RC frame were significant, so it is worthwhile to establish nonlinear models suitable for precast frames in seismic analysis. This study is valuable for understanding and distinguishing the nonlinear response of precast frames and traditional RC frames.

This paper provides a practical design method for hybrid unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete joints. Such joints featured with self-centering capacities have been widely favored in recent years. However, the absence of design methods hinders their further promotion. To solve the issue, two methods for calculating mechanical behavior of the joints were first studied: characteristic points method and iterative method. The effectiveness of the methods was verified by the existing test results. On this basis, a joint design method considering both yield bearing capacity and energy dissipation capacity was proposed. Moreover, to facilitate design, some factors affecting the bearing capacity were discussed. A five-story frame structure was designed by the proposed design method, and the influence of two design factors on structural response was analyzed by utilizing nonlinear time-history method. The analysis results show that: with the increase of energy dissipation factor αs, the post-earthquake residual deformation of the structure tends to increase linearly, while the accumulated damage of the structure will decrease continuously; both overdesign and underdesign of bearing capacity of the joint are unfavorable; and near-field earthquake may cause irreparable damage to structural columns, making the residual deformation of structures contrary to the self-centering capacity of joints, which shall be considered during engineering design.

The accurate prediction of nonlinear structural behaviors under different seismic intensities is an important basis for seismic resilience assessments of building structures. The moment–rotation relationship is often used to characterize the seismic performance of connections, and is widely used in high-efficiency nonlinear structural analysis. In this paper, a method of calculating the curve using a four-linear equivalent model is presented, aiming to quantify the characteristic point parameters of the moment–rotation curves of monolithic precast beam–column (MPBC) connections for engineering design purposes. The method considered the contribution of the elastic flexure of beams and columns, the relative slip of beam longitudinal bars in the core zone, and the formation of plastic hinges at beam ends to the total deflection. Due to the presence of local complex configurations in MPBC connections, the fine fiber section method was used for moment–curvature analysis of critical beam sections. The determination of the sectional analysis processes was controlled by the strain of steel bars or concrete or their coupling effect. In addition, a two-step method was proposed to construct the moment–rotation relationship of cruciform beam–column connections for solving the deformation compatibility of beams on both sides of the column caused by asymmetric reinforcement and the strength difference between new and old concrete. To reflect the current manufacturing level of MPBC connections, 58 representative specimens reported in recent years were analyzed and classified as type 1–5. All types of MPBC connections and their 18 cast-in situ counterparts were calculated using the proposed method for both verification and quantification. The verification showed that the proposed method had good applicability to both cast-in situ and precast beam–column connections. The quantification showed that the characteristic point parameters were slightly different between these two connections. Accordingly, modification coefficients were suggested for MPBC connections to facilitate design.