A palaeomagnetic pole position, derived from a precisely dated primary remanence, with minimal uncertainties due to secular variation and structural correction, has been obtained for China’s largest dyke swarm, which trends for about 1000 km in a NNW direction across the North China craton. Positive palaeomagnetic contact tests on two dykes signify that the remanent magnetization is primary and formed during initial cooling of the intrusions. The age of one of these dykes, based on U–Pb dating of primary zircon, is 1769.1 ± 2.5 Ma. The mean palaeomagnetic direction for 19 dykes, after structural correction, is D = 36°, I = − 5°, k = 63, α95 = 4°, yielding a palaeomagnetic pole at Plat=36°N, Plong=247°E, dp = 2°, dm = 4° and a palaeolatitude of 2.6°S. Comparison of this pole position with others of similar age from the Canadian Shield allows a continental reconstruction that is compatible with a more or less unchanged configuration of Laurentia, Siberia and the North China craton since about 1800 Ma

We tested single‐domain (SD) and multidomain (MD) theories of the acquisition and thermal demagnetization of thermoremanent magnetization (TRM) and partial TRM (pTRM) in Thellier paleointensity determination, using as samples plagioclase and mafic minerals extracted from Matachewan diabase dikes. Susceptibility, hysteresis, and coercivity data indicate that the plagioclase contains mainly SD grains of magnetite while the mafic minerals (clinopyroxene, biotite, and actinolite) contain mainly MD magnetite. The extracted minerals were used in simulated Thellier experiments with laboratory TRM as a proxy for natural remanent magnetization (NRM). The plagioclase behaved ideally, as predicted by Néel SD theory, giving a linear NRM‐pTRM (Arai) plot with positive pTRM checks. The mafic minerals behaved nonideally, with strongly curved Arai plots sagging below the ideal SD line, in accord with observations for MD magnetites and with predictions that in heating to moderate temperatures T, more TRM is lost than can be regained as pTRM, causing convex‐down Arai plots. In experiments with pTRM parallel to NRM, all pTRM tail checks were zero, but pTRM checks increasingly deviated from the Arai curve toward the SD line as T increased. However, in repeat Thellier experiments, pTRMs at all T agreed with the original pTRMs. The negative pTRM checks were therefore not due to physicochemical alteration but rather to departure from initial states with different magnetic histories than those of the original pTRMs. The inability of pTRM checks to reliably distinguish between MD behavior and irreversible alteration could lead to overestimates of paleointensity from straight‐line fits to the low‐T “unaltered” part of the Arai curve or underestimates from fits to high‐T data. Alternating field cleaning to 15 mT before each Thellier step made the Arai plot only marginally less curved. Low‐temperature demagnetization (LTD, zero‐field cycling through the 120 K Verwey transition) hardly changed the curvature of the Arai plot for pTRM parallel to NRM. For pTRM perpendicular to NRM, LTD led to an inflected Arai curve straddling the ideal SD line. Data of either form would not give reliable paleointensity values. No presently available pretreatment renders the paleointensity data of MD grains usable. SD and nearly SD grains which behave ideally in the Thellier experiment remain the only useful recorders of absolute paleointensity.

No abstract

No abstract