The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Palliative Care recommend screening all patients for palliative care (PC) needs and to call a PC consult when referral criteria are met. The goal of this pilot project was to evaluate the feasibility of implementing the screening and referral components of the NCCN Guidelines for Palliative Care in patients admitted to the Gastrointestinal Oncology Service (GIOS) at a comprehensive cancer center (CCC). Floor nurses performed the initial screening of all patients admitted to the 2 teams-Team A and Team B-of the GIOS on one floor of Memorial Hospital for 3 months. In addition, only the patients admitted to Team A were evaluated according to the referral criteria, triggering a PC consult if results were positive. Nurses were surveyed regarding satisfaction with and the acceptability of screening. During the study period, 229 (90%) total admissions were screened, with 169 (73%) having positive results. Of the Team A admissions, 72 (64%) met the referral criteria. More consults occurred for patients in Team A (47 vs 15; P=.001). In 30% of the referral criteria-triggered consults, the PC needs were manageable by the primary team. Nurses reported screening to be easy and quick (<5 minutes per patient) but only somewhat helpful. Being unfamiliar with many patients and families, floor nurses often felt unable to screen them accurately for some issues. In conclusion, screening was feasible, increasing access to PC, but accuracy and usefulness are concerns. With a consult indicated in 64% patients, yet with 30% being manageable by the primary team, the current criteria may be too sensitive for the inpatient environment of a CCC. More evaluation is needed before widespread implementation can be recommended.

We studied whether a short course of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administered to normal donors immediately before bone marrow (BM) harvest would shorten time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment in matched related allogeneic BM recipients. Twenty-nine normal donors received 4 consecutive daily subcutaneous injections of G-CSF (median dose, 12.1 microg/kg per day; range, 9.6-15.7 microg/kg per day) immediately before BM harvest. Donors tolerated G-CSF well, with only mild myalgias and arthralgias, and BM was easy to aspirate. The BM harvest contained a median of 5.3 x 10(8) white blood cells (WBCs)/kg (range, 3.1-11.1 x 10(8) WBCs/kg) and 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg (range, 1.5-7.3 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg). Median times to neutrophil (18 days [range, 11-30 days] versus 22 days [range, 16-36 days]; P = .05) and platelet (22 days [range, 15-55 days] versus 27 days [range, 18-46 days]; P = .04) engraftment were statistically shorter than those of historical control subjects whose donors had not received G-CSF before BM harvest. However, secondary engraftment-dependent outcomes including red blood cell and platelet transfusions, febrile days, days on antibiotics, days from transplant to hospital discharge, and days in hospital during the first 60 days after transplant were not statistically different from historical control subjects. We conclude that G-CSF administered to normal donors immediately before harvest facilitates BM aspiration, increases the WBC content of the harvest, and hastens neutrophil and platelet engraftment compared with historical control subjects.

This is a well-tolerated, active regimen for the treatment of HRPC. Toxicity was not different in patients with prior pelvic XRT, although these patients had a lower MTD.

No abstract